The "Rat" knife.
Ah those pieces of unobtainium. Still haven't been able to locate any of that series...I have long given up.
Quote from: Chako on September 14, 2014, 09:05:50 PMAh those pieces of unobtainium. Still haven't been able to locate any of that series...I have long given up. As far as I know 2 MTO members together hold the complete set. Karl has one half and Def the other. Very highly doubt any of those two would part with them.
Quote from: enki_ck on September 14, 2014, 09:12:57 PMQuote from: Chako on September 14, 2014, 09:05:50 PMAh those pieces of unobtainium. Still haven't been able to locate any of that series...I have long given up. As far as I know 2 MTO members together hold the complete set. Karl has one half and Def the other. Very highly doubt any of those two would part with them. There is a 3d member who has half the set.
I have six of the Urban Chameleons. Think Def has most (but not all) of the rest.
If you're looking for really radical SAK knives just look at some of what Wenger turned out: Minathor, Bernina, Giant, Reed Knife, and what is probably their biggest fiasco: Business Tool. One model wasn't enough, they made 4 models of this tool. Think of the cost that went into designing and producing these models. I don't doubt that this contributed to Wenger going belly up.Victorinox, on the other hand, has been relatively conservative in introducing new models, and many of their new ones are but minor modifications of earlier ones, thus reducing costs considerably.
Quote from: marduk on September 22, 2014, 12:02:05 AMIf you're looking for really radical SAK knives just look at some of what Wenger turned out: Minathor, Bernina, Giant, Reed Knife, and what is probably their biggest fiasco: Business Tool. One model wasn't enough, they made 4 models of this tool. Think of the cost that went into designing and producing these models. I don't doubt that this contributed to Wenger going belly up.Victorinox, on the other hand, has been relatively conservative in introducing new models, and many of their new ones are but minor modifications of earlier ones, thus reducing costs considerably.Yeah, but all of that contributed to the fact that Victorinox never fully dealt with their flaws: after 100 years their scissors are still half-baked; they still haven't found a can opener design that works really well in 50 years; they keep including a small knife blade when they could use that slot for a nail file (as Wenger has been doing for years); their wire stripper has never worked; they are only now starting to adapt to the fact that people no longer need a parcel hook, decades after the post office stopped allowing parcels to be wrapped with string; and their pliers have been second rate ever since they made their debut nearly 30 years ago.Meanwhile, Wenger at least tried to innovate: their scissors are better than the competition - the spring never breaks, never needs replacing; the can opener, while less intuitive, opens cans faster; they ditched the small knife and replaced it with a nail file and nail cleaner that could also be used as a Phillips head screwdriver (admittedly only if you grind the tip off a bit); and their pliers work well and are adjustable.In my view, as is so often the case in the business world, the company with the better product lost out to the company with the better P.R., logo and business model.
First, Wenger had some great designs and innovation but the went bankrupt, so they are no example for how to do it.
...many of your points are personal.
Quote from: Etherealicer on September 22, 2014, 03:24:53 PMFirst, Wenger had some great designs and innovation but the went bankrupt, so they are no example for how to do it.Sure, if being the last surviving company is the criterion for success. I tend to see it differently - the mark of success in my book is that you make the best stuff. I'm finally beginning to see that Wenger succeeded where Victorinox has still failed to succeed. After all, if Victorinox make the best SAKs, why have they been so quick to rebrand the Wenger EVO and EVO S series with the Victorinox name? If Wenger's products were worse, Victorinox should have dumped them. Instead, the new Vic Evolutions all seem to have Wenger pattern pliers, Wenger scissors and even (as far as I can tell) the Wenger bottle top lifter.
Sure, if being the last surviving company is the criterion for success. I tend to see it differently - the mark of success in my book is that you make the best stuff.
After all, if Victorinox make the best SAKs, why have they been so quick to rebrand the Wenger EVO and EVO S series with the Victorinox name?
If Wenger's products were worse, Victorinox should have dumped them. Instead, the new Vic Evolutions all seem to have Wenger pattern pliers, Wenger scissors and even (as far as I can tell) the Wenger bottle top lifter.
surely scissors whose spring doesn't break are objectively better than scissors whose springs routinely bend and break and need replacing
surely a can opener that works faster is objectively better than one that does it slower.