QuoteOthers. What else could others mean in that particular sentence? I mean, it couldn't POSSIBLY be anything else. You can dig for further meaning, but others is self explanitory in that situation. I know it helps with a reply to tear a post apart, but this time..... not so much. If I had put people, you would have said "What people?" If I had put adults, whites, blacks, latinos, martians, etc, you would have questioned it.Simple sentence. Simple messege. Will not elaborate because it can't be simplified more then it is.Heh, don't worry, it was a semantics thing, and it was enough of a passing fancy not to try to say it again
Others. What else could others mean in that particular sentence? I mean, it couldn't POSSIBLY be anything else. You can dig for further meaning, but others is self explanitory in that situation. I know it helps with a reply to tear a post apart, but this time..... not so much. If I had put people, you would have said "What people?" If I had put adults, whites, blacks, latinos, martians, etc, you would have questioned it.Simple sentence. Simple messege. Will not elaborate because it can't be simplified more then it is.
LatinoHeat.... here we are posing the merit of which is right... nature verses nurture. likely the answer is all of the above yet, if we concede that intelligence is potential then we would could reason that someone with the genetic predisposition to have potential heart diseas is intelligent. i.e, this person would be the most intelligent heart attack with the most potential to be a heart attack of all. that same person could get ran over by a bus b/c they are stupid way before they realised their true potential. the OP is really trying to justify UK laws. unless i'm proven wrong these are the laws the UK republic have chosen. they have the right to change them. possibly, the question is do they have the potential? i don't know.i do know that sometimes people do stupid things and no matter what you do you can't stop it. you have to let them be stupid b/c that is their potential. if i have a sharp knife i might cut myself. if i have a locking blade knife i might cut... myself? i don't get it but then i'm a couple of sandwitches shy of a picnic.
i'm a couple of sandwitches shy of a picnic.
QuoteMOVING RIGHT ALONG:Okay, so of you Pro-Lockers out there, where's the line between "Locks are good!" & "Carrying a Fixed blade"? (laws notwithstanding)laws not withstanding then i see no line between the two. each suited to their needs and use. it is up to the individual to define needs and use.
MOVING RIGHT ALONG:Okay, so of you Pro-Lockers out there, where's the line between "Locks are good!" & "Carrying a Fixed blade"? (laws notwithstanding)
Simple answer - no. If your EDC requires locks yer full of crap, unless you happen to be a hermit who lives alone in the forest. As for saftey, any buffoon with a knife should know what safe cutting practices are (and if you actually practice them, guess what, you won't get cut!), and for anyone with a job that requires it work tools are excused as long as you're not actually trying to EDC it...Now, it's perfectly nice to play it safe. In my opinion locks shouldn't be banned, however, perhaps one-hand opening knives? Which I suspect is the real problem... but I think a lot of laws are just so they can stack up charges against a person who is intending to do harm rather than restrict your rights. There just happens to be lots of crooked cops...
Quote from: One Lame Frog on August 27, 2009, 05:39:13 AMSimple answer - no. If your EDC requires locks yer full of crap, unless you happen to be a hermit who lives alone in the forest. As for saftey, any buffoon with a knife should know what safe cutting practices are (and if you actually practice them, guess what, you won't get cut!), and for anyone with a job that requires it work tools are excused as long as you're not actually trying to EDC it...Now, it's perfectly nice to play it safe. In my opinion locks shouldn't be banned, however, perhaps one-hand opening knives? Which I suspect is the real problem... but I think a lot of laws are just so they can stack up charges against a person who is intending to do harm rather than restrict your rights. There just happens to be lots of crooked cops...But why OH knives?!? Bottom line is this, it's not the friggin tool/gun that's the issue it's the muppet that is using it.
Quotei'm a couple of sandwitches shy of a picnic.but all full up for Snow Wizards? I was trying to get a picture of some bicycle riding, truncheon wielding pommy bobbies, but I typed "oi oi oi" and ended up with naked harry potter.
Quote from: Nomad on August 27, 2009, 03:34:18 AMQuotei'm a couple of sandwitches shy of a picnic.but all full up for Snow Wizards? I was trying to get a picture of some bicycle riding, truncheon wielding pommy bobbies, but I typed "oi oi oi" and ended up with naked harry potter.please define the word pommy and oi....
Quote from: sappyg on August 29, 2009, 03:13:43 PMQuote from: Nomad on August 27, 2009, 03:34:18 AMQuotei'm a couple of sandwitches shy of a picnic.but all full up for Snow Wizards? I was trying to get a picture of some bicycle riding, truncheon wielding pommy bobbies, but I typed "oi oi oi" and ended up with naked harry potter.please define the word pommy and oi.... Well a pommie is one of us Brit's And Oi, is our polite way of getting someones attention shortly before smacking them in the face