I think it's being blown WAY out of proportion.
Quote from: ducktapehero on November 06, 2009, 08:21:18 PMI think it's being blown WAY out of proportion.I totally agree with you.A.
No, so far only a little over 1600 people have died from the H1N1 flu. On average 36,000 people die every year from the normal flu. I think it's being blown WAY out of proportion. Plus I've got issues with the safety of the vaccine.http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic_in_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak
Quote from: ducktapehero on November 06, 2009, 08:21:18 PMNo, so far only a little over 1600 people have died from the H1N1 flu. On average 36,000 people die every year from the normal flu. I think it's being blown WAY out of proportion. Plus I've got issues with the safety of the vaccine.http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic_in_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreakPretty much my thoughts as well (and pretty much everyone medical related that I work with).
No, so far only a little over 1600 people have died from the H1N1 flu. On average 36,000 people die every year from the normal flu. I think it's being blown WAY out of proportion.
I am not following your argument. If 1600 people have already died from H1N1 in the US, and the flu season has only just begun, wouldn't that indicate that H1N1 will likely prove much more dangerous than regular seasonal flu?
QuoteI am not following your argument. If 1600 people have already died from H1N1 in the US, and the flu season has only just begun, wouldn't that indicate that H1N1 will likely prove much more dangerous than regular seasonal flu?One thing that is lacking right now is how many people have died from the regular flu. But even those numbers are enough to show that it's not the deadly killer that everyone seems to be making it out to be. According to my links they've been tracking it in the US since late March 2009. So that's 1600+ people in 8 months so no, I'm not worried too much about it.Now if it mutates and the lethality rates skyrockets that's one thing but the chances of that happening are extremely rare.
No flu vaccinations for me. Aside from my distrust of things that "everyone is doing", I haven't had the flu in about 10 years, and one cold about two years ago. Common sense goes a long way at preventing disease.
DTH, I hafta tell ya', that's not true. H1N1 has a history of mutating and acquiring lethal abiliities.
We've had SARS, Monkey Pox and now this. What I'm worried about is that they'll keep yelling "pandemic" and just like the boy crying wolf the public will eventually just blow the news off.
Quote from: ducktapehero on November 06, 2009, 08:21:18 PMNo, so far only a little over 1600 people have died from the H1N1 flu. On average 36,000 people die every year from the normal flu. I think it's being blown WAY out of proportion.I am not following your argument. If 1600 people have already died from H1N1 in the US, and the flu season has only just begun, wouldn't that indicate that H1N1 will likely prove much more dangerous than regular seasonal flu?In other words, H1N1 has already matched the peak month of a seasonal flu season, and the flu season is only just starting. How does that make it less dangerous?