Yep maglite are great,Here's a couple of mine..A mini mini mag(Image removed from quote.)A 2D lightly modded(Image removed from quote.)Yep they make great hosts.I've not tried any of the new mags that have come out yet, they cost too much here in the UK
I want to like that XL50, but I just can't do 3xAAA.
Quote from: NutSAK on February 06, 2011, 10:28:58 PMI want to like that XL50, but I just can't do 3xAAA. Protected 18500 perhaps?
I gotta ask how you did up the mini-mini-maglite. Is there a tutorial somewhere?
Quote from: jekostas on February 06, 2011, 11:00:00 PMQuote from: NutSAK on February 06, 2011, 10:28:58 PMI want to like that XL50, but I just can't do 3xAAA. Protected 18500 perhaps?Right, never mind - I just saw the battery carrier that Mag uses in those lights. It would be a PITA.
there is a list of most maglite's and their outputs and run times on a table about half way down this page: http://www.led-resource.com/2010/01/maglite-led-flashlight-review-and-guide/It has the standard 2xAA as having 12 lumen. Go's to show that one big advantage of a focusing system is that it's able to make the most of a comparatively low output.
If you really want a super mini mini mag I suggest looking at budget light forums. A p-60 sized drop in will fit in a mini mag with minor modification. That's going to be a new project for me when I get all these mods caught up. You could use a high power 4.2 volt battery in it as well.
Quote from: Gareth on April 28, 2012, 03:37:02 AMthere is a list of most maglite's and their outputs and run times on a table about half way down this page: http://www.led-resource.com/2010/01/maglite-led-flashlight-review-and-guide/It has the standard 2xAA as having 12 lumen. Go's to show that one big advantage of a focusing system is that it's able to make the most of a comparatively low output. 12 ?! omG, thanks a lot! I'll definitely read the link later Have to hurry, have work to do... forum, leave me alone...
Unfortunately, in a lot of ways lumens is not a very good measure with which to compare different lights.As I understand it, lumens is a measure of the total light output of the emitter, but depending on how the light is made, some of those lumens may not be in the hot spot. That is why a Mag with a focusing head can appear brighter, at times by putting most of the light output into the hotspot. The downside is that there is quite a bit of light generated that is "lost" inside the Mag's head when it is extended to focus.That's why a a 12 lumen mag with a focused hotspot can seem brighter in a certain area than a pure flood light like some of the Zebralights (that put out 200+ lumens). Its just that the Zebra's output in this case is spread out over a large area.A better way to compare how lights use their lumens is the lux measurement.From wikipedia:"The lumen can be thought of casually as a measure of the total "amount" of visible light in some defined beam or angle, or emitted from some source. The number of candelas or lumens from a source also depends on its spectrum, via the nominal response of the human eye as represented in the luminosity function.""The difference between the units lumen and lux is that the lux takes into account the area over which the luminous flux is spread. A flux of 1000 lumens, concentrated into an area of one square metre, lights up that square metre with an illuminance of 1000 lux. The same 1000 lumens, spread out over ten square metres, produces a dimmer illuminance of only 100 lux."So, basically, It is hard to judge a light based on its stated lumen output. In my experience you have to try it out to see if it is suited to your intended application based on how the lumens are used.