Nice. I recently got a mid-80s (solid awl) one like the top in your photo. I think the 86-87 version you have is the toughest version to find - tougher than the Victoria versions of this knife.
I added the early one to the main desc. I put the alternate view/side shot on the click.The others I'll try to work into links in the variations. The combined ones are not very useful at that size. 350px size is good for those to be featured in the main desc, the others can be bigger. It's good to maximize the use of the frame for the small ones if possible. The main ones can be bigger as well, as long as they are clear enough when using the simply quick browser scaling they are clear. I think at least now it is clear that there are two quite different versions.Thanks!
Thanks, those are nice clear pics, how about uploading those to SAKwiki I think they would make a good set. Those are pretty clear, we can let the browser scale them as required so the large view is available.If you like I can upload the images if you've never done that, and don't care to get started.
Excellent info & pics guys!What if you exchange the Phillips on that old Craftsman (with the fish scaler) for a corkscrew? What model would that be? I think I found one of those somewhere
Is it me or does the reamer/awl look a bit strange? Broken, maybe
Quote from: Reinier on March 01, 2011, 04:06:25 PMIs it me or does the reamer/awl look a bit strange? Broken, maybe It's probably fine. On the older knives pre-91, the key ring attachment is on the pen blade spacer. So the backspring for the awl is flat and there's a gap at the end. Also looks like that is a pre-83 awl, so there's no taper to it. It's just ground into a point at the end. Can't be 100% sure without better pictures, but most likely it's OK.
....BTW: I like the updated Craftsman Wiki entry....looks good!!!!
Did either you or Jazzbass pick up that one on ebay today?