Excuse my ignorance but why does it matter? Are they not built to Spyderco's specifications?
We soon simply will not have to worry about it. The USA will have nothing made here. I guess that would make some people happy. It's a shame that nobody cares anymore. It will be a sad day when I walk into an antique store someday and all the products are from China.
Quote from: Gadget Guy on August 10, 2011, 07:22:06 PMWe soon simply will not have to worry about it. The USA will have nothing made here. I guess that would make some people happy. It's a shame that nobody cares anymore. It will be a sad day when I walk into an antique store someday and all the products are from China. Now now old timer, settle down. It'll never get that bad... hopefully.
I suppose it's good you have a choice. I don't think there are many industries left in the UK I guess that's what makes the likes of Leatherman special So another question; why do Spyderco make some stuff in the US but others they outsource to China, Japan, etc.?Is it all down to cost and price point?
Part of why Spyderco manufactures overseas has to do with price points. In the case of the Tenacious line, in order to keep costs low they have to build in China. The majority of it is compromise, as the Japanese knives show. However certain rules regarding import/export of materials also apply. ZDP-189 for example can only be exported from Japan as a finished product, so any knives using this steel have to be made in Japan. At the same time American steels from carpenter and crucible are not worth exporting for assembly. The exception to all of the standard logic is the Sage series, which is made with American steel and assembled in Taiwan. If I recall the reason it is done in Taiwan is that Sal could not get any other factories to build the knife with the materials he wanted and to the specs he required. (Japanese factories did not want to use imported steel, American manufacturing would have nearly doubled the price).