Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


91 or 84?


gb Offline AimlessWanderer

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 17,517
  • I'm not a pessimist, I'm an experienced optimist!
Re: 91 or 84?
Reply #1 on: June 29, 2012, 07:19:41 PM
I don't think an 84mm fish scaler was ever made ... so 91mm.
I am very good at being wrong though  :D


The cantankerous but occasionally useful member, formally known as 50ft-trad


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: 91 or 84?
Reply #2 on: June 29, 2012, 07:30:28 PM
I think it is a 91 too. I can't figure out why it went so high.


us Offline stressmaster5000

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,414
  • No PM's - just email please
Re: 91 or 84?
Reply #3 on: June 29, 2012, 07:53:48 PM
I don't think an 84mm fish scaler was ever made ... so 91mm.
I am very good at being wrong though  :D
Correcto-Mundo, it should be a 91mm. I think it went high because the fish tool is the only other layer besides the normal. Typically a fish tool layer comes with a scissors or pliers so that should make it a somewhat rare model. Pretty beat up though.


bg Offline fenofedd

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 135
Re: 91 or 84?
Reply #4 on: June 29, 2012, 08:19:02 PM
Pretty beat up indeed  :(
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 09:27:09 PM by fenofedd »
DM HG


ch Offline ong

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 128

us Offline Sazabi

  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *******
    • Posts: 6,397
Re: 91 or 84?
Reply #6 on: June 29, 2012, 11:57:30 PM
I know that one of the Battle Series knives was a modern rendition of that model; I wasn't aware it was a regular model in the past. :tu:


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
June Goal: $300.00
Due Date: Jun 30
Total Receipts: $91.95
PayPal Fees: $4.93
Net Balance: $87.02
Below Goal: $212.98
Site Currency: USD
29% 
June Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal