EDIT This is another suggestion, but I think it's secondary to the reason that J-sews has offered.Maybe the orientation of the halves of the tool might have been changed so that a right-handed person has a better view of the wire cutting blades when cutting or stripping a wire. If I'm cutting or stripping a wire with the wire in my left hand and the tool in my right hand, I would tend to view where I'm cutting by viewing the tool from the left side. If I did that, I could see where the top blade of the cutter was meeting the wire easier with the newer version. With the older version, the bottom blade would be on the side that I'm viewing, but would be partially obscured by the wire that I'm cutting.Uh.... I hope that made some sense...
The vic pliers used to be the same as LM, but they changed them for the reason they mentioned. More force on bolts is usually put in the counterclockwise direction. So imagine you are gripping a bold with the end of he pliers, the Vic one doesnt stress the pivot, but pushes the halves together.The scissors dont have the same use case, so I dont even think it matters which way they are.
Quote from: Syph007 on May 03, 2014, 04:13:46 AMThe vic pliers used to be the same as LM, but they changed them for the reason they mentioned. More force on bolts is usually put in the counterclockwise direction. So imagine you are gripping a bold with the end of he pliers, the Vic one doesnt stress the pivot, but pushes the halves together.The scissors dont have the same use case, so I dont even think it matters which way they are. Look again, at the wire cutters...