Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings

Quartz · 37 · 3312

Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
I'm trying to make a custom SAK. I'd like to get a layer with the inline phillips and a backside tool. The inline phillips is wider than any of the saw/file/scaler layers alone. Would it be possible for me to take two of the backsprings from those and put them side by side? How similar are the shapes of those springs, and which backside tools pair up with what? Searching for teardown images is kinda confusing, I think two of the springs might be the same, but I can't tell which because it seems to vary depending on model.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #1 on: September 16, 2014, 08:06:13 PM
Here is an Swisschamp XLT. The ends of the springs seem quite different between the inline phillips and the file/saw. It might work.



Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #2 on: September 16, 2014, 08:27:45 PM
Images like that (and this one here) are my problem- the parts are just kind of in a pile and it's not totally clear how things line up. It looks like the saw and fish scaler have identical springs, but no back tool? This appears to be different from other models like the Craftsman:



I know that the end of the saw/file/scaler springs will be different compared to the one for the phillips. I'm not terribly concerned about that because I figure I can probably grind them to do what I want.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #3 on: September 16, 2014, 08:30:33 PM
Also, I can't really tell the thickness on these layers. Are the saw and scaler next to each other at least as thick as the phillips? I know they're both pretty thin on their own.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #4 on: September 16, 2014, 08:32:17 PM
I am pretty sure the file, saw and fish scaler springs are inter changeable. Maybe one is thinner than the others by a bit? I know the saw back spring can have a backside tool or no backside tool. When I get home I can measure the thickness of them all.


gb Offline AimlessWanderer

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 17,517
  • I'm not a pessimist, I'm an experienced optimist!
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #5 on: September 16, 2014, 08:40:13 PM
I have a Champion which has the fish scaler next to the saw, and the fish scaler tool and spring is noticably thinner.


The cantankerous but occasionally useful member, formally known as 50ft-trad


wales Offline hiraethus

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *
    • Posts: 6,965
  • I brake for cake
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #6 on: September 16, 2014, 08:46:02 PM
I think that two saw springs are the same thickness as the pliers, which is thicker than the Phillips. That's probably the right way round as you can always use a washer next to the Phillips to space it out.


gb Offline AimlessWanderer

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 17,517
  • I'm not a pessimist, I'm an experienced optimist!
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #7 on: September 16, 2014, 08:48:32 PM
I have a Champion which has the fish scaler next to the saw, and the fish scaler tool and spring is noticably thinner.

Best I can measure with what's to hand, is around 1.5mm on the scaler and 1.8mm on the saw


The cantankerous but occasionally useful member, formally known as 50ft-trad


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #8 on: September 16, 2014, 08:59:03 PM
I think the phillips is like ~2.5mm and the pliers are around 3mm area. So any two should be wide enough? OK.

Next question then is figuring out which models have two springs with the same shape that support some kind of back tool.


wales Offline hiraethus

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *
    • Posts: 6,965
  • I brake for cake
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #9 on: September 16, 2014, 09:03:13 PM
Swiss champ and ranger for sure - both have wood saws and metal files with back tools.  Handyman and Cybertool 41 too.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 09:05:56 PM by hiraethus »


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #10 on: September 16, 2014, 09:06:02 PM
Right, but are the springs the exact same shape? It's not clear to me from the pictures I've found if they're exactly the same, or just close. I don't really want to do any more grinding than I absolutely have to as it'll only make the springs weaker.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #11 on: September 16, 2014, 09:15:48 PM
I think one has a bigger nub on the end to raise the tool for easier opening. Isn't there going to be a big open space opposite the Phillips?


wales Offline hiraethus

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *
    • Posts: 6,965
  • I brake for cake
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #12 on: September 16, 2014, 09:18:58 PM
File, saw and scaler tools and backsprings from a Swiss champ I took apart earlier this year:


From what I can tell, the file and saw springs are exactly the same.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #13 on: September 16, 2014, 09:27:03 PM
OK, thanks. I was hoping the Swisschamp might offer that, as it would give me the inline phillips in the same package.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #14 on: September 16, 2014, 09:38:30 PM
Oh, I want to double check something- the saw/file/scaler hinge on the "fat" end of the knife, right? The same end as the bottle opener?


wales Offline hiraethus

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *
    • Posts: 6,965
  • I brake for cake
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #15 on: September 16, 2014, 09:51:02 PM
Yes, that's right.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #16 on: September 16, 2014, 10:28:48 PM




hr Offline enki_ck

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *
    • Posts: 20,904
  • I may get older but I refuse to grow up.

Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #18 on: September 16, 2014, 11:18:31 PM
Oh awesome, thank you! That's exactly what I was envisioning. Which springs did you use from which SAK?

Also, can you post a pic looking "down" so I can get an idea of how much wider the springs are than the phillips? I want to get a feel for what kind of washer(s) I'll need to deal with and to what extent the phillips tip hangs over the edge of the liners.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #19 on: September 16, 2014, 11:26:21 PM
Isn't there going to be a big open space opposite the Phillips?

I plan on cutting off the pin holes on that end of the springs and putting some other tool there (haven't really decided what though). What I want to avoid is having two springs with different shaped nubs on the end I put the phillips on- I'll have to grind them down so they're both even before the tool will pivot correctly, and if I make the nubs too thin they're likely to snap after a few years of use.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #20 on: September 16, 2014, 11:28:03 PM
The standard file/saw backspring. Screw driver I get 2.75mm. 1.7mm for the spring.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #21 on: September 16, 2014, 11:31:27 PM
I get 1.8mm for the saw and file. Fish I get 1.55mm.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #22 on: September 16, 2014, 11:34:32 PM
Wait I'm confused, the saw/file is 1.8mm wide but the springs for them are only 1.7?


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #23 on: September 16, 2014, 11:38:09 PM
Yup fairly normal. They want the tool tight, but the spring floats in side a bigger hole. Also the springs are thicker in the middle than at the ends.


Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #24 on: September 16, 2014, 11:45:29 PM
Urk. I swear every time I come up with an idea there's always a gotcha. Now that I think about it, it makes sense that the springs have to be faintly thinner so that they can move freely. This means I'll need a thicker spacer on the phillips (and whatever other tool I put on the opposite end) to compensate. Still doable, but I'll have to be more careful about measuring. I worry about the overall thickness of the layer, but I guess it can't possibly be worse than the bit driver on the cybertool.

Thanks for your help btw.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #25 on: September 16, 2014, 11:51:36 PM
I used the older longer screw driver too, not the new one.






Offline Quartz

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 240
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #26 on: September 16, 2014, 11:55:40 PM
The new and old drivers are only different in length and position catch, right? (Thickness is the same?) I'm assuming any knife I buy new would have the new driver.

Oh, and when you say "The standard file/saw backspring"... that doesn't explain it to me :) The normal champ, champ XLT, craftsman, etc all seem to do it differently. I want to make sure whatever knife I buy to chop up has what I need in the right combination. (I'm hoping these were from a normal champ, as that looks like the best donor otherwise).


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #27 on: September 17, 2014, 12:07:42 AM
I think they are all the same. XLT Swisschamp and Craftsman all have the same file saw backside tool spring. Now with no back side tools, there are at least 3 versions. thick, thin and nubs and no nubs. Here is a bunch from, your guess is as good as mine.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #28 on: September 17, 2014, 12:10:13 AM
I think you need the gray mag glass ones to get the old long Phillips. I get the same thickness on old and new style.


us Offline GigaHz

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,143
Re: Question about 91mm saw / metal file / fishscaler backsprings
Reply #29 on: September 17, 2014, 12:21:50 AM
Scissor spring.


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
April Goal: $300.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Total Receipts: $122.41
PayPal Fees: $6.85
Net Balance: $115.56
Below Goal: $184.44
Site Currency: USD
39% 
April Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal