I'm still rather impressed that you stood on the Sidekick to up the force and suffered no ill effect.
I'm not defending the Engage, but it looks like the saw gave a much cleaner cut, than the saw of the Sidekick.Keep up the carnage
Oh Les Stroud how could you!?!? HOW COULD YOU PUT YOUR NAME ON THIS?Signed,
Have you used it as a hammering implement yet?
Wire cutting test.How thick of wire can it cut.Coat hanger wire I'm betting but nothing much thicker
So... I went out into the garage, to get MORE nails.(Image removed from quote.)Both the Engage and Sidekick cut through the trim nail.Then I got to that roofing nail.I had to press the Engage against the floor of the garage to generate enough force to cut the roofing nail, bit it DID IT... kind of.The result is that now, when the handles are fully pressed together, the plier head doesn't close. FAIL!(Image removed from quote.)And just so you all know, I ALSO cut the roofing nail with the Sidekick. The anvil cutters of the Sidekick required even more force than the Engage's. I was LITERALLY standing on the handle of the plier to push it closed. I was applying probably 150 lbs of force when the Sidekick cut the nail, and something more like 100 or less when the Engage cut through.There is absolutely ZERO damage to the Sidekick. While I would consider this test abusive, it also makes me REALLY appreciate how well the Sidekick is made. Not so much with the Engage.I didn't bother trying the largest nail, since the Engage is pretty well done with any nail cutting, or fine plier work, from now on.
I don't know how I missed this
2 words - blow torch. you know for those times when your MT falls in a volcano and you have to fish it out