Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


A very strange SI model 1961

us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
A very strange SI model 1961
on: August 15, 2016, 09:39:25 PM
Has anyone seen one like this before? Blank WK plate and dateless reverse ricasso?

Is it like a factory error? Did it not pass inspection?


00 Offline kirk13

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • *
    • Posts: 15,518
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #1 on: August 15, 2016, 09:41:42 PM
Definitely a reject. Undoubtedly it's flawed and dangerous to use. You should send it directly to Blamington Hall for immediate disposal!

 :D
There is no beginning,or ending,and for this we are thankful,cos now is hard enough to understand!


us Offline SAK Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 23,929
  • "Spending all of my money and time Oh, ho ho...'"
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #2 on: August 15, 2016, 10:11:18 PM
Unless it's stamped "Swiza", it's not a reject.....

 :pommel: :pommel: :pommel:

More likely, it's a post 08 knife known as a Swiss Army 70

Variation 3
http://www.sakwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page=Wenger+Soldat+1961+-+Standard+Issue


..or it could just be a factory error as the SW70's usually don't have a WK plate..IIRC.


...or a repair/ replacement to a reg SI with a post 08 blade.


« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 10:18:04 PM by SAK Guy »
- Robert




Quo Fata Ferunt
"It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues." - Ten Bears


us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #3 on: August 15, 2016, 10:41:44 PM
Unless it's stamped "Swiza", it's not a reject.....

 :pommel: :pommel: :pommel:

More likely, it's a post 08 knife known as a Swiss Army 70

Variation 3
http://www.sakwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page=Wenger+Soldat+1961+-+Standard+Issue


..or it could just be a factory error as the SW70's usually don't have a WK plate..IIRC.


...or a repair/ replacement to a reg SI with a post 08 blade.

the primary stamp is small v vssr

the openers are also unpolished with a grain to them


us Offline SAK Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 23,929
  • "Spending all of my money and time Oh, ho ho...'"
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #4 on: August 16, 2016, 01:03:36 AM
Unless it's stamped "Swiza", it's not a reject.....

 :pommel: :pommel: :pommel:

More likely, it's a post 08 knife known as a Swiss Army 70

Variation 3
http://www.sakwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page=Wenger+Soldat+1961+-+Standard+Issue


..or it could just be a factory error as the SW70's usually don't have a WK plate..IIRC.


...or a repair/ replacement to a reg SI with a post 08 blade.

the primary stamp is small v vssr

the openers are also unpolished with a grain to them

Then #3 would be my best guess....  :cheers:
- Robert




Quo Fata Ferunt
"It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues." - Ten Bears


us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #5 on: August 16, 2016, 01:13:35 AM
I'm not sure, I would think if that were the case it would be a large V vssr stamp with something stamped on the reverse if it were a blade replacement.


hr Offline enki_ck

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *
    • Posts: 20,935
  • I may get older but I refuse to grow up.
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #6 on: August 16, 2016, 01:49:51 AM
This is a Vic, not a Wenger, right?

The tang stamp you're describing is Victorinox/Switzerland/Stainless/Rostfrei

So it would be a Vic Soldier, not a Wenger SI.

This one probably wasn't issued, so it didn't go through the control process where it would have gotten the WC and year stamps.

It was probably made from spare parts they had in the factory that did not get used up and they were short on the Pioneer ones. This looks to be a late 70's model. But I'm by far no Soldier expert so if I'm wrong, someone will correct me soonish. ;)


us Offline SAK Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 23,929
  • "Spending all of my money and time Oh, ho ho...'"
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #7 on: August 16, 2016, 01:55:42 AM
I'm not sure, I would think if that were the case it would be a large V vssr stamp with something stamped on the reverse if it were a blade replacement.


Wenger was still making blades for a while after 2008...but they had no date on the back, hence the Swiss Army 70 model designation. Wait a minute, is this a Vic Soldier or a Wenger SI?

added  I see enki_ck asked my question.
- Robert




Quo Fata Ferunt
"It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues." - Ten Bears


us Offline SAK Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 23,929
  • "Spending all of my money and time Oh, ho ho...'"
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #8 on: August 16, 2016, 01:58:50 AM
This is a Vic, not a Wenger, right?

The tang stamp you're describing is Victorinox/Switzerland/Stainless/Rostfrei

So it would be a Vic Soldier, not a Wenger SI.

This one probably wasn't issued, so it didn't go through the control process where it would have gotten the WC and year stamps.

It was probably made from spare parts they had in the factory that did not get used up and they were short on the Pioneer ones. This looks to be a late 70's model. But I'm by far no Soldier expert so if I'm wrong, someone will correct me soonish. ;)

That's what I would think too if it's a Vic...I assumed it was a Wenger by the title.
- Robert




Quo Fata Ferunt
"It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues." - Ten Bears


us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #9 on: August 16, 2016, 02:20:33 AM
My apologies I assumed SI meant standard issue, for both makers


us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #10 on: August 16, 2016, 05:18:09 PM
So is this a rarity? I've not heard of or been able to find anything regarding this instance.


us Offline SAK Guy

  • *
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 23,929
  • "Spending all of my money and time Oh, ho ho...'"
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #11 on: August 16, 2016, 05:54:39 PM
So is this a rarity? I've not heard of or been able to find anything regarding this instance.

I don't think it's super rare....it's the same as a Pioneer/Farmer showing up with dated Soldier blades only in reverse.

This is the first occurrence of the reverse repair I've seen and it's a pre 85 (IIRC) blade so I guess it's rare in that respect. Maybe very rare in that respect.  But, I would hazard a guess that all future 61 Soldiers, regardless of age will have undated blades because the contract is up and all the dated blades are probably gone. They will be, by necessity, be repaired with undated Pioneer/Farmer blades.

I'd put it up and not use it if it were me.

Does that help or did I manage to confuse everyone.   :facepalm:
« Last Edit: August 16, 2016, 05:59:15 PM by SAK Guy »
- Robert




Quo Fata Ferunt
"It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues." - Ten Bears


us Offline Pile Driver

  • *
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 344
Re: A very strange SI model 1961
Reply #12 on: August 16, 2016, 07:07:51 PM
So is this a rarity? I've not heard of or been able to find anything regarding this instance.

I don't think it's super rare....it's the same as a Pioneer/Farmer showing up with dated Soldier blades only in reverse.

This is the first occurrence of the reverse repair I've seen and it's a pre 85 (IIRC) blade so I guess it's rare in that respect. Maybe very rare in that respect.  But, I would hazard a guess that all future 61 Soldiers, regardless of age will have undated blades because the contract is up and all the dated blades are probably gone. They will be, by necessity, be repaired with undated Pioneer/Farmer blades.

I'd put it up and not use it if it were me.

Does that help or did I manage to confuse everyone.   :facepalm:

Makes sense to me, between the blank WK square and the undated blade, there's something up with it. Unfortunately it's been sharpened, not terribly but it has a wider bevel than factory.


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
May Goal: $300.00
Due Date: May 31
Total Receipts: $66.45
PayPal Fees: $3.99
Net Balance: $62.46
Below Goal: $237.54
Site Currency: USD
21% 
May Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal