This scenario is exactly why I keep harping on that the MT needs to evolve in to more task specific tools. It's ridiculous that they all sell their own version of the same tool layout. The market out there must be huge.As I say most people I know and those I work with would undoubtably buy an all-in-one-tool that was both designed and built for the job in hand. A cycling MT with its pozi/flat drivers, numerous hex keys is probably more useful to a mechanic or engineer than any of the MTs out there.As I've said before it's a crying shame that the likes of CRKT didn't get Wenger! That would have shaken things up!
Quote from: tosh on January 27, 2017, 07:29:14 AMThis scenario is exactly why I keep harping on that the MT needs to evolve in to more task specific tools. It's ridiculous that they all sell their own version of the same tool layout. The market out there must be huge.As I say most people I know and those I work with would undoubtably buy an all-in-one-tool that was both designed and built for the job in hand. A cycling MT with its pozi/flat drivers, numerous hex keys is probably more useful to a mechanic or engineer than any of the MTs out there.As I've said before it's a crying shame that the likes of CRKT didn't get Wenger! That would have shaken things up! If you need lots of screwdrivers, a bit-kit is probably the way to go.I love the idea of trade-specific tools but they face some serious challenges:Smaller target group == higher R&D cost per item AND higher production cost == Higher priceIf you really want a specialized tool, it will also end up being country specific, which reduces target group even more.On the other hand, individual tools have so many benefits:- You can use your screwdriver and pliers at the same time- The individual tools are cheap and easily replaced- They work better (no MT can match a screwdriver)