It works(with a little grinding) on 93mm alox.91mm though...Much harder, I don't even know if anyone has done it.
Quote from: Pablo O'Brien on March 03, 2017, 04:35:18 PMIt works(with a little grinding) on 93mm alox.91mm though...Much harder, I don't even know if anyone has done it. Forgive my ignorance, but what is the difference?
How about a combo tool with the Inline Phillips?Would that work?
Quote from: 4everYoung on March 03, 2017, 05:57:04 PMHow about a combo tool with the Inline Phillips?Would that work?Combo tool is the thickness of small blade, and do you mean opposite or beside the inline philips?
Next question. Could I use the bottle opener on a 91mm plus a spacer on the same layer as a inline Phillips?That would give me and inline flat driver
I'm not opposed to having backtools I just don't like to use them. So that's really a non issue for me. As for the the 93 mm, I do have a pioneer X already. I'm not a collector so..... it's all in the table at this point.
The only alternative to the mag glass that is possible is a 93mm bottle opener. But its takes significant reshaping and you have to relocate the pivot hole. If you hold that part over top of a mag glass part you can get an idea of how it needs to be shaped.The 91mm opener doenst have enough material to reshape into a mag glass replacement.The phillips across from dual openers is not possible on 91 due to the backsprings AND there isnt enough space the phillips would hit the openers.
The mag glass is one of those cool tools.
Opposite. I guess I should divulge my plan. Basically I like the tool layout of the mechanic but I don't like the back side Phillips. Honestly I do t really care for back side tools anyway.So I was wanting to mod a mechanic or deluxe tinker with inline Phillips. My ideal SAK would be 91 or 93mm main blade. Inline awl or small blade. PliersScissor(possibly but I've come to appreciate the 58mm scissors so I'm undecided on them )Inline Phillips and inline flathead. That would be either a 3 or 4 layer depending on scissors.
Quote from: 4everYoung on March 03, 2017, 06:29:38 PMOpposite. I guess I should divulge my plan. Basically I like the tool layout of the mechanic but I don't like the back side Phillips. Honestly I do t really care for back side tools anyway.So I was wanting to mod a mechanic or deluxe tinker with inline Phillips. My ideal SAK would be 91 or 93mm main blade. Inline awl or small blade. PliersScissor(possibly but I've come to appreciate the 58mm scissors so I'm undecided on them )Inline Phillips and inline flathead. That would be either a 3 or 4 layer depending on scissors.Cybertool M has everything you want, and no magnifying glass. Plus more bits and a pen. (Image removed from quote.)
This is my custom by Syph with the 93mm bottle opener across from the 91mm inline phillips. It also has the 93mm awl, 93mm blade, and 91mm metal saw/file. Figure I can cut through just about anything with it. The 91mm pliers seem more like glorified tweezers than usable pliers,which is why I skipped them. I also am not a scissor user. Anyway, no keychain attachment and no backside tools. All function. Love this tool. It's got titanium scales and cost a pretty penny, but it should last a lifetime.(Image removed from quote.)Good luck.