I dont have quite the collection of old SAKs that many have. I have a few 60s era that are in remarkable shape. All but one can go right into my pocket and be used in the manner it was built for. I don't have any old (30+) SAKs that are pristine ( never used ), so thinking about a 30+ year old tool that was used and still capable of being used is pretty remarkable. Am I correct? How many things can claim to be still useable after so many years? Lets consider how these items (SAKs) are being used. The 84mm Golfer I recently got has a cracked liner and is one of the only SAKs that I've got that has suffered a "fault' thats not abuse. I don't know, maybe it is from abuse but reading thru the threads I suspect its the material coupled with lack of care?
I got a 83-84 Ranger ( my guess on age ) and its in splendid condition. Yeah so 35 years isn't old, but for a knife I'd say it is
. This is sort of my point. When do we consider Victorinox knives old? Most other knives we consider old beginning at 20 years or so, am I correct? Some of y'all have carried the same SAK longer than 20 years.
Is it that Victorinox is so well built that 30 years barely begins to age them?