Your English is just fine, and even if it weren’t no apology would be necessary. As Cody said, Alox models are more robust than their cellidor counterparts. Both the Cadet and the Alox Bantam are terrific knives. They are very capable and remarkably thin.
My English is zero but after many years I may have learned to manage Google translator well ;-)Thanks for the reply, now I just have to decide which of the two (or both) Alox models are a bit expensive but I really want one of them.
My English is zero but after many years I may have learned to manage Google translator well ;-)
Either of those will be excellent knives. The Cadet probably gives you a few more tools to choose from but the advantage to the Bantam is that it is super slim. Of course, the Cadet is pretty slim itself! One of my favorite SAKs of that size is my Alox Lumberjack. I have just found the woodsaw very useful on my walks and I have the Lumberjack in my small Otterbox survival kit.
I would go for the Cadet. More usability and still pretty thin.
Thanks, things like this (pins and springs) is just what I wanted to know.Also be certain that the "side torsion" (example when using the multi-tool) is as good as the standard model.I saw that the Alox models are really low!Only 8 mm for Cadet and 6 mm for Bantam, do they hold equally well compared to a standard model but with greater thickness?
I just checked mine, and I have to admit that there seems to be a small area on the blade that gets scratched. I never noticed that until I just paid attention to it
I awlways recommend the pioneer
Worth noting that the 93mm (Pioneer) range was initially known as the Sturdy Boy rangeAnd was specifically marketed by Victorinox as being stronger for tough tasks.
Proof:
Nice FB - Thanks - Brilliant -
Nice SAK and pic FB!
Proof:(Image removed from quote.)
It will be a very difficult choice, Bantam, Cadet, Pioneer, Farmer.All these Alox are beautiful .. and I can't buy them all as I would like
You win the thread