I take a .22 very seriously Fortunately where I live daily carry is not justifiable, not that we're crime free but still relatively peaceful.If I was living next country over in any of the big cities of South Africa that would be a different story....I'm not very experienced, but if I could choose again I'd go with a small .38 revolver. We're only allowed one handgun, which I did not know when buying my single action .357 toy A friend who works at a gun shop has one of those CC-orientated revolvers, 5 shot I think, feels lovely in my hand and would be ideal to take along on hikes.This is the danger zone for us, the hiking trails on the outskirts of town.
In your first story you say that it proves that the .22 has one shot stop power and then immediately demonstrate that even at close range, it required two hits just to stop the attack.
I think he was trying to say the first shot missed. He wasn't sure where it went. The second shot seemed to have actually hit the attacker, immediately dropping him to the ground. At least that's my take on it...Sent from my moto g(6) play using Tapatalk
Sorry I misunderstood what you were saying. But I agree with you. I have a Glock 19, have had it since the late '80s. I rarely carry it because it is just too bulky and not comfortable to have on me. I have been looking for a smaller gun to carry, as I have been downsizing as well. Sent from my moto g(6) play using Tapatalk
Very nice text thread. I started with a Glock 26. Great gun. I can shoot it well. But...I rarely carried. Does me no good. Then I bought a Glock 19. Guess I went the wrong way for CCW, but doesn't everyone need a 19? Truly my favorite pistol to shoot. I prefer it over my Sigs (which I sold), my VP9 (ticked me off that I shot my Glock 19 better because operators carry HK, right?). Next, my Glock 43. Once again, great gun. Not too bad to carry, but...I still don't. I just don't like IWB carry. I think it is going to come down to me carrying something OWB when I can. When I have a flannel on (typical during the winter) or a coat. But in shorts weather or jeans and light tshirt only, the OWB just won't fly in my neck of the woods. That brings me to a true pocket pistol. And I don't mean my .38 airweight 642 in my sticky pocket holster. Still a bit big for a regular jeans pocket. Those that can, great! I wish I was one of you. I really do. My buddy appendix carries a Glock 17 with cut down magwell every single day. Your talk about the NAA .22 really interests me. That is something I could carry daily. No matter what. I think I'll look into one in .22 magnum.
Just hope that your opponent with the sword is more than 20 feet away when you reach for your gun or you are going to wear that big blade home.https://www.shootingillustrated.com/articles/2017/10/16/the-21-foot-rule-why-is-it-important/Further proven by the Mythbusters.Def
That Mythbusters video is a bad joke and totally bogus. Who is going to be carry a gun on an empty chamber? Jamie was giving his bud extra time to slant the "test". Certainly no LEO or even half bight civilian. If they tried that with a double action revolver or any Glock type semi that had a round chambered, it would not go well for the knife guy. Totally slanted so called test from the Myth Busters. Very disappointed by them.
Lots of reasons this could happen. That's the thing with guns. There's various things that need to happen for them to work. Knives awlways work! Even broken!We awlso need to consider that not everyone carrying/using a gun is an expert. They can take too long to respond to a threat. The gun might get caught when they're pulling it out. For those reasons, I don't think the video is that far from reality.
Is there a right or wrong here?Also, why do gun related topics always end up in people trying to get their right?I'm out again
The idea of carrying one up the spout without any safety is rather American and certainly not universally held.
Pretty much. The idea of carrying one up the spout without any safety is rather American and certainly not universally held.