I´m just thinking about the PX. A lot of PX´s were made by modders before Victorinox noticed there was a market for it. Were these modders really heretics? I´d rather call them visionaries.
It’s fun to have discussions about “What if you were stuck on a tropical island/on a mission to Mars/trying to survive TEOTWAWKI and you could only take one MT…”
Many Thank to ALL on MutiTool Forums!
The idea of modifying one’s tools/equipment to better suit need certainly goes as far back as mankind has been using tools.Conceptually, I think it’s a good thing, as it allows folks to get something that better meets their needs. Sometimes really useful and popular mods even make it into regular production (whether the manufacturer admits mods were the inspiration or not).From a personal practical standpoint, however, I rarely if ever make major modifications. We have so many good SAK, MT, knife, and tool options on the market today. If I feel what I have is seriously deficient for my needs or a certain scenario, it probably makes more sense for me to just buy something (or some things) that come closer to what I want vs. trying to modify what I have.The Pareto Principle also applies, i.e. if I can get off-the-shelf solutions that give me 80% - 90% of what I want, I’m probably not going to expend a large amount of time or money trying to get that last 10% - 20%. To me, this is kind of the essence of SAKs/MTs anyway. Clearly, there are inherent trade-offs for a small pocketable tool set vs. a large toolbox/bag/bucket. It’s fun to have discussions about “What if you were stuck on a tropical island/on a mission to Mars/trying to survive TEOTWAWKI and you could only take one MT…”, but that doesn’t reflect reality for most people most of the time. For me (and I think for most), the value of an MT is being able to take care of that loose screw, errant tree branch, jagged fingernail, stubborn bag of chips, etc. without having to go to the garage/kitchen/bathroom/truck/basement for a dedicated tool. And if 90% of the time the SAK/MT can take care of those issues, and 10% of the time I have to go fetch a dedicated tool, I put that down as a huge win for the MT, not a deficiency because there were 10% of the tasks it couldn’t do.
Circle back to what I said earlier, it is always about being happy. If it makes you happy, go for it!
I used to think so, until I realized the answer to any such question is invariably: " A Swisschamp".
To that I say: Victorinox moves in a mysterious way. Why were the 84 mm scissors discontinued? Why did the 58mm combo tool never make it to the 74 mm line? Why didn't Victorinox bring scissors to 93 mm SAKs decades ago? If only we knew, we might be closer to understanding how the universe works. But we don't, and why not accept it with humility? Victorinox giveth and Victorinox taketh away. This is the way.
Much more exciting and engaging finding creative ways to use what you have in your pocket for your immediate need, than chasing some unicorn SAK perfection that is impossible to find.
Think a few of you non heretics should try some of these prefab kits off AliExpress. This 84 mm Yeoman (minus hook) has titanium scales and snaps like a factory production model.
is modding wrong because the meaning of SAKs is to receive in humility what Victorinox giveth us and make the best out of it?
Were it the holy Victorinox would actually giveth me the tool combo I want, I'd have no need to moddeth mine SAKKE....
I would have to agree that the perfect SAK exists, at best, only in the moment or in a certain scenario. As stock Vic offerings go the Manager is hard to beat for urban everyday and the Ranger is pretty near perfect for out in the woods/camping purposes…It is the Champ that spoils it as that has everything that you could sensibly want/need in one package so everything else just falls short…I did manage to get the basic functionality of a champ into 5 layers instead of 8 so would have to say that’s about the most satisfactory reconfiguration I’ve achieved so far ….there are 3 or 4 others (based on a Ranger toolset) that I am happy with but generally I end up taking them apart again to make copies of discontinued model which I often find more satisfying….except the Outdoorsman which I thought I liked initially but really didn’t in the end. So my ‘close enough’, I’d have to say, is a Ranger!
Uh, no, quite the contrary actually. The idea is to humbly receive what Victorinox in their infinite wisdom have made and see that it is, behold, very good. Your argument is a Promethean one, and we all know where that got him... Just sayin'
Wenger did already make the very best EDC knife, albeit imperfectly burdened with Evo scales.
So while trying to play god, you realized the error of your ways and now you try to recreate Vic's extinct creations instead? Sounds like the plot ot a Mary Shelley novel
I wonder which model you have in mind?
Mmmm kinda! With the occasional bit of FrankenSAK serendipity….so not completely backtracking. This one for instance makes it all worth while for me and the black one I almost feel should be a production model!!!