Aaaaaand, I think I've already talked myself out of it.
Cellidor isn’t as durable as alox, but it is better than it sometimes gets credit for. (If you haven’t already, take a look at “The 30 Day Victorinox Huntsman Challenge!” thread.) YMMV, but personally I find that cellidor is plenty durable for what my EDC typically sees. With the exception of scenarios where a replacement would be difficult to get, such as perhaps a military deployment or extended camping trip, I feel that the additional utility of back tools trumps the superior durability of alox.The combo tool isn’t as stout as the bottle opener/flat screwdriver tool. Adding a small one piece pry tool (PWII, GPT, etc.) may be the way to go depending on what level of force you are using, but of course your tool count then goes back up.I find the Vic removable scale pen quite awkward to use, so unless you only carry the pen for very short and very occasional use, you’re probably going to want to stick with the Fisher bullet there.I actually prefer the Climber over the Compact as a stand alone SAK, for the following reasons:- Two knife blades instead of one- Climber has the awl, while Compact does not- Bottle opener/flat screwdriver is more robust than the combo tool for stubborn screws and or prying - I don’t consider not having plus scales any great loss (and if you did, you could always put plus scales on a Climber)- Climber’s can opener tip is great on most commonly encountered Phillips screws, as long as they aren’t too deeply recessed. Compact doesn’t have a great way to handle Phillips screws; some advocate for using the corner of the combo tool, but I find this awkward at best.- Not having the nail file is a bit of a loss, but between the knife blades and scissors I can generally make do without With regard to the sentimental value, only you can judge.
Now what did you go and do that for! I am a fan of the Compact. I like the toolset it has. But I can clearly see your point about carrying sentimental tools.
lol, it’s not a bad knife, I myself am still hooked on alox, and haven’t carried anything besides a FarmerX for like 3yrs, I did get a compact but I kinda switched things around, cause I added an extra layer adding a saw and switched out the corkscrew for a Philips, that made it have all my tool needs with the multi hook which has the file as bonus tool, but I’d still rather carry the FarmerX with a alox keychain, JR
(Image removed from quote.)The Compact is not my favorite because it lacks a phillips driver. You can always carry a phillips driver with your keys, though. Though the corner of the flat driver can be used for phillips, its not optimal for that use.
Good job!
I have been carrying something like a compact (subbed phillips for corkscrew and replaced combotool for 93mm awl). My takeaway is that knowing you can have 1 sak on you that covers so much is great, and being 2 layers is great. I actually left the house today and needed the scale pen. That said, a Pioneer + small SAK are formidable and easy to carry. I pry things frequently and have actually bent the awl and combotool before, never the can opener and cap lifter through.
I also vastly prefer the Climber, and for much the same reasons. To me, the traditional opener layer is just too useful for so, so many things (official uses and otherwise). I have a 91mm Golfer (the Compact’s immediate predecessor) and I have to say that the combo tool just doesn’t cut the mustard for me. Also, the Compact is only a couple of millimeters thinner than the 3 layer Climber - and the Compact is normally about twice as expensive as the Climber for those of us in the States. That said, there are a lot of Compact fans out there, if the internet is any guide…
I have a couple of Compacts. They are ok and are probably dandy for working in an office: thin and unobtrusive and including scissors. I find the tool set somewhat underwhelming. I actually think I would like the Yeoman tool set better than the Compact.
I am fan of Climber too, actually. It offers the set of tools I use most. I like Compact however I would appreciate it to be 84mm instead of 91 to be more compact Recently I ended up carrying combo of miniChamp and EDC folding knife.
I have as well somewhat ambivalent relatiosnhip with Compact. My approach to SAKs is rather minimalist, so in theory the Compact should be an excellent solution.I even enhanced it with Quattro screwdriver as scale tool (https://forum.multitool.org/index.php/topic,90094), I find the combo tool sufficient and do not feel the need for full opener layer, but still I prefere for normal use Waiter/Bantam/Wenger 63 + any 58 with scissors.Why is that I am not sure... It is more the feelings only - I prefere just the single layer in my pocket, tactile feeling of the aligned back spring in bantam/wenger 63, the 91s feel too large vs 84s....If I want to have only one SAK on me, then Compact is a rational choice, but I am not in love with it.On the other hand - why not to try it? Sometimes only the real hands-on experience can tell and may open new path.
Compact's are great but you probably want a Pioneer X since you don't like scale tools. I would go Pioneer X or Electrician or both. They are both around $50 each. Compact's is sexy in black. Black Knive Matter !!! BKM
I tried the Compact but missed the dedicated drivers and openers. The combo tool didn’t fail on me but I could tell the dedicated drivers were more robust especially when prying.
That's a good pairing!
The minichamp/single blade folder is a cool combo. I think I'd end up needing bigger drivers, but I can see how it would be useful.