Multitool.org Forum
Tool Talk => Collector's Forum => Topic started by: gerleatherberman on July 12, 2018, 02:42:59 AM
-
I am sorry if this has been done already. But, this is just a photo comparison of my blunt-nose MultiMaster and needle-nose MultiMaster.
Keep in mind, the normal blunt-nose MM has a can opener, not a cutting hook.
These were made in different years, because the tools are slightly different, but it gives an idea of the jaw shape and size. :)
-
Last pics. The tools (see 1st post).
-
And yours is blunt nosed too--that's really odd. I think a lot of rare short run custom orders and prototypes end up in regular Kutmaster production, namely as seconds. Mine came in a lot of seconds, a blunt nosed standard CAT, completely unmarked needlenose, and needlenose with strap cutter (in place of the can opener)made for an "overseas contractor" and came in Mountain Quest (the Chinese version of the Multimaster) sheaths and with four-piece bit kits. Your configuration would be more or less the perfect work tool for me. Too bad gut hooks and strap cutters are rarely taken seriously by multitool makers.
Very neat looking tool, can't wait to hear what Kutmaster says about it. I always rely on my Multimaster to handle the stuff my other tools won't. Their pliers I think are unbreakable, even with what I do. I just wish the cutters didn't ding so easily.
-
Thank you, Cody!
I am pretty close to trying a MM out at work. The BN version seems really suited to a lot of tasks. I'll just throw a minitool in a pocket for any NN tasks. Interesting that the cutters ding easily. I'll be careful with them to be sure. :ahhh
The quality is definitely there and I like the design of the pliers. Especially the big BN pliers. :)
-
Are they really that robust? How are the rest of the tools? :salute:
-
The tools are fairly acceptable in form and apparent function(as far as initial inspection). The NN in my photos is a slightly older one and the file is better cut. :)
I won't know how robust they are until I carry one, but the construction seems proper. :cheers: