Quote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 02:10:39 AMQuote from: CumminsDiesel on May 28, 2010, 01:44:45 AMQuote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often?Dave,:-) its fairly often and not just a few people.I would hazard a guess that about 75% of the criticism of Leatherman on this site in the last week has come from just you, give or take. You seem to be on some kind of trip to share your limited, and somewhat odd experiences.Quote from: Mercury on May 28, 2010, 01:43:29 AMQuote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often? Not aimed at you I know, but this seems to be a xerox of the thread that made me realize I was wrong. It made me smile.The gist here, Cumminsdeisel, is that it is a ridiculous notion to think that anyone here but Chako has enough of any MT to make statements like the ones you have made. Trust me, I used to sound like you, really I did. But I realized that even owning 2 or 3 of the same model doesn't make a quorum to vote like that. You simply cannot back up the statement that you made. How do you know they have bad QC in almost every unit? You don't. And on the pliers note, I would venture to say that they have been putting cap crimpers in their tools for a long time. If it was a weak point, it wouldn't have made it this long. I bet you break the pivot point before you break the pliers at the crimper.6 surges is not enough to make those allegations. The solution: STOP BUYING SURGES! It is obviously not the tool for you. Try an ST300, I love mine! Plus I have heard that despite the weight, the Surge isn't as robust as the ST300.
Quote from: CumminsDiesel on May 28, 2010, 01:44:45 AMQuote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often?Dave,:-) its fairly often and not just a few people.I would hazard a guess that about 75% of the criticism of Leatherman on this site in the last week has come from just you, give or take. You seem to be on some kind of trip to share your limited, and somewhat odd experiences.Quote from: Mercury on May 28, 2010, 01:43:29 AMQuote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often? Not aimed at you
Quote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often?Dave,:-) its fairly often and not just a few people.
Most people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often?
Quote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 01:20:11 AMMost people? Or is it just a few people who repeat it often?
TBH the Ti , TTi file rub really annoys me. The question as to the % of Titanium Charges effected is the big one .I have seen a tradesman's diamond file completely worn down at the rubbing point on his Charge & he said the same thing had happened on his previous Charge. . The 3 Charges I have owned all had file rub.I can not remember hearing of anyone having an issue with file rub on a Wave Maybe someone should send Leatherman an email & ask them if they are aware of significant file rub issue on their Ti & TTi Charges
So, how many Charges then?
Buy the ST300!Oh yea and nice TTI!
As far as the implement placement, I personally prefer the inside openers. I tend to twist the tool when driving a screw, so I accidentally open the blades when I do so. On the subject of Charge files, I have only owned 2, which were ALX models. Both had a file that rubbed, but not near enough to be called a "defect". From what I have heard, the Charges have that issue, so either forget about it or move on to a different tool.
Cummins,Just out of curiosity... is English your second language?
Quote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 03:15:14 AMSo, how many Charges then?Dave,here is MultiMat with (3 Charges) and Mercury (2 Charges) with a same file problem (a common problem of Charge),and I think here is a lot of people with same problem.
Quote from: CumminsDiesel on May 28, 2010, 03:26:13 AMQuote from: DaveK on May 28, 2010, 03:15:14 AMSo, how many Charges then?Dave,here is MultiMat with (3 Charges) and Mercury (2 Charges) with a same file problem (a common problem of Charge),and I think here is a lot of people with same problem.So that's 5 then? Let's call it 10 to cater for the "lot of people" you refer to and Mat's friend......So you have 10 Charges with a problem, I have 14 good ones and Nuphoria's is fine too, so that's 15.Do you accept that your comment was wrong yet?
Quote from: glorn on May 28, 2010, 05:22:57 AMCummins,Just out of curiosity... is English your second language?Yes.Any problem?
Its so hard to understand me?Actually not just second but third language
Just for the sake of discussion, it seems like some people are getting a very biased sample of LM tools, QC-wise. I wonder if there is some specific connection/correlation there... For example, lemons coming from the same online seller/warehouse or refurbished/reselled by the same LM rep... I mean, assuming that each multitool purchase is the equivalent of a uniformly random draw, the probability of x successive "lemons" is really miniscule, unless there is some bias introduced in the process...