I really wasn't going to buy one until some of that negativity got me curious. I was prepared to dislike it based on other's opinions, but once I took the knife out, it won me over quickly.
I just don't understand how it's "simpler" or even "Japanese."
Nope, still ugly, sorry.
Well then you will be missing out then. If you can live without the tweezers and toothpick, the Tomo shape is actually better then the "proper" shape for holding the knife steady. The rounded classic has a tendency to roll around when in use. The Tomo doesn't.But to each their own. My intent was not to convert others. I just wanted to see what all the fuss was about. Stirling3749, I do believe that the hair tie, not only being a very nice touch on the packaging, sort of points to the true demographics for this knife.
Stirling3749, I do believe that the hair tie, not only being a very nice touch on the packaging, sort of points to the true demographics for this knife.
I don't get it - it is no narrower, shorter or slimmer - why couldn't they have fitted the tweezers & toothpick? I can understand the Alox Classic losing the tweezers & toothpick, that is the trade-off for the slimmer tool, but why couldn't the Tomo have had a couple of suitable grooves made somewhere for the removable tools?To me it looks ugly and it has less features, I don't see the appeal.
Its actually very closely sized to the classic to my surprise. It seemed as it would be a bit larger.
Some comparison shots with a Classic.(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)You can see, size is very similar. It just looks a lot larger in photos.