• pre-1975 Windsor (pre 1980 stamping, pre-1975 scissors)
• 1975-1980 Windsor (pre-1980 stamping and post-1975 new grind and V spring)
• 1990 Moneyclip (scissors with screw, so pre-1991, but with grooved handle and V-spring with cam so post 1990)
• 2005-2007 Moneyclip (post 2005 stamping, 1991-2007 scissors: steel pivot)
• 1990 Ambassador (1975-1990 scissors, 1980-1990 stampings)

Would it be at all useful to put this in the Wiki somewhere, which shows how you can move from Spartan to SwissChamp adding one tool layer at a time amongst the knives in the Victorinox  2015 catalogue? Or maybe an expanded version showing discontinued knives as well (which could get messy!)?

• My preference is still the sequence I discuss above (all L,B,S together and within that Spartan, Champ, others)  - But that's just me. If you do leave it as it is now - One change I would make is to swap the position of the CS and Phillips - So that all the L's and B's are together in that section
  
• The hyperlinks to Champions and Cybertools don't work - That probably was me - Sorry 
  
• The hyperlinks to mainblade and awl and small blade don't work
  
• The list of 'common to all' tools would be better with commas - This is really OCD  !!!
  
• For the six + layer table I don't think you need the extra text saying how many layers is in the SAK - It's in the table above - So unneccessarily doubles the depth of the table
  
• The tool to model reference is brilliant - I always wanted one of those - I would be tempted not to bother with those tables for the Spartan toolset  - As the tables are so big (eg check out the keyring!!) and pretty much all SAKS have the Spartan tool set, but the rest are really, really useful 
  
• The Cyberbits related SAKs table - Should probably be the Cybertool not the bits
  
• Love the family tree too - Really nice - Really useful - That could go somewhere on the tools main page, or better still the page of 91mm (and 84mm) SAKs that does not have the layers ?? Someone else here did one of those with all the models, and as you say it was pretty complex - So I think your curent model one works best - And you can always cross reference a current model to an older model if you will
  
• M47 - Re the scissor dating tables - I was planning to upload my tool dating spreadsheet into a new section in the tools main page - So it would fit nicely there - I will make a separate post about that!!
  

My preference is still the sequence I discuss above (all L,B,S together and within that Spartan, Champ, others)  - But that's just me. If you do leave it as it is now - One change I would make is to swap the position of the CS and Phillips - So that all the L's and B's are together in that section

The hyperlinks to Champions and Cybertools don't work - That probably was me - Sorry 

The hyperlinks to mainblade and awl and small blade don't work

The list of 'common to all' tools would be better with commas - This is really OCD  !!!

For the six + layer table I don't think you need the extra text saying how many layers is in the SAK - It's in the table above - So unneccessarily doubles the depth of the table

The tool to model reference is brilliant - I always wanted one of those - I would be tempted not to bother with those tables for the Spartan toolset  - As the tables are so big (eg check out the keyring!!) and pretty much all SAKS have the Spartan tool set, but the rest are really, really useful 

The Cyberbits related SAKs table - Should probably be the Cybertool not the bits

Love the family tree too - Really nice - Really useful - That could go somewhere on the tools main page, or better still the page of 91mm (and 84mm) SAKs that does not have the layers ?? Someone else here did one of those with all the models, and as you say it was pretty complex - So I think your curent model one works best - And you can always cross reference a current model to an older model if you will

• Re-ordered the Swiss Buck Model List from alphabetical - to Layers within Length, then alpa
  - If you are a SAKWIKI user trying to find a knife (eg just bought off evilbay) - you will more than likely know it's length, and # layers, but not it's name - so the table will work much better for you now.
  BTW - I had a big, big fight with the wiki table - But got there in the end, and it looks great now
• On going reformatting of the Related Knives section (orphaned bulets and icons)
• Revised the Spartan intro paragraph (  very brave, for such an iconic SAK !!) - Is it OK?

I realize this ain't a "submit errors" thread but here I go again  <--me
Is this supposed to be 100mm?

The SAKWiki is a wonderful thing, but I've not been able to find any way to search it - am I missing something obvious, or is search for some reason not currently implemented?

Yes I have had that problem too - And also used M47's 2nd solution

However there is a native serach capability - But only if you logon with your user id

If you logon then  a search field  becomes available where the logon fields were and it works just like you'd expect it to - even your search term is highlighted in the texts

Yes I have had that problem too - And also used M47's 2nd solution

However there is a native serach capability - But only if you logon with your user id

If you logon then  a search field  becomes available where the logon fields were and it works just like you'd expect it to - even your search term is highlighted in the texts

OK - So you want to get into a 'my way is better than your way' debate

That's fine - I concede - You win - Congratulations 

For me - I was just answering a question that was asked - And Oxford Guy, and anyone else, can make their own decision on what works best/well for them

I just want to take a moment to give a big thank you for all the work that has gone into--and continues to go into--the SAKWiki.

We're fortunate to have such a marvelous resource. I'm sure it will always be a "work in progress," but what a wonderful piece of work it is.