It reminds me of the lack of surveillance cameras in Star Trek (all shows) and how quickly each episode would have finished if they had them, thus finding out what happened in minutes. (Apparently they had none as they have evolved to respect privacy or something similar)
It occurred to me the other day that virtually all classic sitcoms relied heavily on just a few plot points, specifically this one:Character A sees, over years, reads or misinterpret something out of context and ages upon it incorrectly and hilarity ensues until Character B corrects them and everyone learns a lesson.We've all seen it a thousand times, played in different ways depending on the dynamic, and that becomes the basis for my new game, called How Long Would It Last?This game is best played with sitcoms made prior to the mid 90's, because the point of it is to determine how long the episode would actually have lasted if someone could simply make a call, send a text, check their email or even just look at Facebook. Some may complain that I am exposing plot holes in otherwise timeless classics, but it has amused me to no end, particularly with the classic I'm currently enjoying, ALF.I have to wonder how many of his problems stem from being shut in, and could have been alleviated with internet access? Of course, that would have made for much shorter episodes!Def
And yet, at other times they can watch the away team (or whomever) without having a camera placed anywhere!Def