This does look better - does everyone agree?
Can someone propose dates for VaSS/- and VSS/VaO?
We don't have a description of what "Economy Line" is. Maybe we should add a short intro before each table? e.g.:Main Line [link: Victorinox 91mm page]Built on the legacy of the original 1897 Officers' Knife, and set at a family length of 91mm from the early 1950s, the 91mm Main Line is today the largest category of Swiss Army Knives....table...Economy LineThe 91mm Economy Line (known later as EcoLine) started with the Elinox range in 1957 and were typically differentiated from the Main Line by their scale material, scale emblem, lack of scale tools or packaging. From 1980, the tang stamp of The Economy Line adopted those used for the Main Line family, so only the tang stamps unique to the Economy Line are shown below....table... Hoffritz [link: Hoffritz page]Hoffritz was a significant importer and reseller of Victorinox Swiss Army Knives in the USA, with the product uniquely branded for Hoffritz, including a variety of different blade tangs between 1951 and 1982....table...
One thing I would simplify is VaO -> VO. Because there is no VxO to differentiate against.
Perhaps an underline would work to indicate caps or the larger V. So VSSR?
Just a suggestion on the early-mid dates since nobody else has yet:+AS/VaSS — c.’47 to ‘52VaSS/blank — c.’52(Large) VSS/VO — c.’52-c.’53(Small) VSS/VO — 53 -’57ORVSS/VO c.’52-‘57 (if the two aren’t given separate lines and just mention the larger earlier version in text.)jazzbass has identified (at least) 3 different combos for VSS/VO. Large, small I and small II. I think his small II is actually in the middle with a worn early VSS, and the newer small VO. Just what I think as I don’t have a firm opinion on it. IMO—Just 4 stamps in different combos not 5 or 6 per jazzbass.
Sorry for the bad photos. I am not a good photographer.
...this is a difficult one. We'd have VSSR/VOS with both Victorinox and Victoria versions, and if we start putting 'x' in everywhere, it may get a bit messy. What do people think?
...Tiki does not allow mixing of styles, so cannot do underlined and bold ;-(
Hi all togetherI have noticed that a stamp is missing on the Economy range. This is the ESSR-VSSR. According to sakhome.com this stamp was only available in 1975.I have a standard (Spartan) with this stamp.Probably the handles of my knife were changed sometime.
Thanks for pointing out this gap - yes, we need to add this in, so we'll put a placeholder in for the moment. It can be difficult to get a suitable pic. Best to try with natural light, and put a vertical piece of white cardboard next to the SAK to get the white reflection on the tang. Zoom in a little and fill the frame. The examples that kamakiri list on the page are excellent, but don't stress if you battle.
Can you show the bottom of the knife showing the closed awl? I might be able to confirm the production date. That corkscrew does not look like most of the ‘smooth’ cheap metal ones that I have or seen from the ‘70s. Max-There is also the c.’73 RIS/Blank in the Economy line. Will post pic shortly.
Unfortunately, I can't do better than that, because it's already evening at my place.
Like this?
Thanks rookie its in, but if you get a chance, you're welcome to retake when the light's good and you can get a white reflection on the tang.
Perfect! Looks later to me like c. ‘77, with the possibility of later. Perhaps it is the transition to the Economy stamp.
-+VSSR/OS+- to make the V bold you cannot nest the bold within the -+ ... +-
OK I'm not sure why it won't work in that table (haven't tried it, another editor is editing the page) but I've tested this on a blank page and all combinations seem to work:-+__V__SSR/OS+--+''V''SSR/OS+--+''V''SSR/''__O__''S+--+===VS__S__R===/OS+-Sorry, not trying to be a smartass, just trying to help
Oh Boy - This page is looking A--M--A--Z--I--N--GI love the wee boxes around the tang stamp - Looks really, really good and clear - I never even knew about that syntax.This is going to be one of the best, and most useful, pages in the Wiki Great work chaps! I think I spotted one small inconsistency in this line: 91mm/Main/2009 - 2011 The tang stamp says VSSw/OS* whereas the one above says VSS/OS* for the same text in the stamp - The size difference is explained in the textOne other very minor thing: I would not put the (* indicates large V in Victorinox) in brackets - as this is an important note and instruction - Also I usually prefix text like this with a 'Note:' and put it in italics - as it is informs about the page construction as opposed to part of the main textSomething like this:Note: * Indicates a large V in VictorinoxBut this is a very minor point - I'll leave it to you!
Perhaps those notes can be moved to below the tables to avoid text wrapping (I can't get colspan to work with fancytable).Minor detail.