My line of thinking looks to answer the question ‘Is it better to get a flashlight/torch running 1pc AA battery than 1pc AAA batteries?’ Or is it better running 2pcs AA (or 2pc AAA) than 1pc AA?
rechargeable AA last much, much longer on a single charge than any non-rechargeable AA out there.
This really needs to be qualified. I have yet to see any rechargeable AA cell that can outlast an Energizer L91 lithium primary, whose capacity is on the order of 3000-3500 mah.https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/l91.pdf
I choose Alkalines when there is a risk that the battery will be depleted totally, like if a child is using a cheap torch and they leave it on until the battery goes totally flat. This will seriously affect rechargeables, killing an expensive battery.
My question is that ‘will it work?’ Does can a light powered by a single 10440 be replaced with 3pcs AAA? I tried it but it didn’t light up so I’m trying to see if it’s a physical problem (tube is a tight fit at the head so not sure if it’s going in all the way) or it’s a battery problem. Thanks everyone!
I understand alkalines are widely disparaged and shunned among the torch fanboy community, being known as alkaleaks for obvious reasons. I actually only have a few torches for which I use alkalines, one being an original E12 because it doesn't take any other, and two being Maglites that I've had since the early 90s and that come with memories. I usually use the el-cheapo multipacks from IKEA, again just because.
The original E12 works with Alkaline or NiMH. Much better runtimes and no leakage are achieved with NiMH, and they're cheaper in the long run.
This is true, but NiMH cells are not as commonly found when out and about, and will usually need charging when first purchased... whereas alkaleaks are sold all over the place and are an instant swap-out. The only way for NiMH to be as viable is if you also have portable charging, such as a car adapter or a solar kit, but this then adds bulk in your load-carrying equipment.