In my opinion and based on my "experience" (I use that term loosely), there's no good reason to waste the energy needed to split larger pieces of wood in a "survival" situation.
I certainly agree with that. I haven't split many logs with an ax since Boy Scouts, which was too many years ago to contemplate.
In very wet or snowy conditions when you really need to get a fire going, splitting downed branches or hanging squaw wood will usually get you sufficient dry wood to easily start that fire. Splitting branches of less than 4 inch diameter accounts for most of the splitting I've done over the years.
I don't agree with that. I'm not going to explain why, because I don't want to start a self defense debate. I'll happily accept the fact that you have your opinion and I have mine
Actually, knife versus ax for self defense is not a matter about which I have a strong opinion or conviction.
Realistically, I have little faith in sucessfully defending myself with either knife or ax against a big, determined, strong opponent - either human or animal.
Either knife or ax is better than an empty hand for defense, but both pale in comparison to the lightweight pistol I carry along outdoors.
(Before someone points this out: Yes, I am aware that a mere .45 pistol may be worse than useless against a big, determined bear.)
.