I like the old Wengers with traditional scales. You are correct that those evolution scales are excessively thick, more so since they were rebranded as Vic Delmonts.I don't have an Ego 18, but in my experience the Delmonts are the same thickness and weight as the Vic 91s with the same number of layers. Other than the slight difference in length, you're not saving any weight or size with the Delmonts. I'd just as soon get the bigger tools on the 91.Scissors are another matter. There is a difference between the Vic and Wenger designs. I prefer the Vic scissors, but there are fans of the Wenger scissors. One important issue is how you use them. If you like to cut paper and plastic with a "push" technique, the serrations on the Wenger don't work with that technique. On the other hand, the Wenger style serrations work better at chewing thru things like nylon wire ties.
I have the S18 and a huntsman (which is close to an exact comparison i guess). If you dont need a locking blade go with the Huntsman in my opinion. Saw is much, much better, has spon for pin and mini screwdriver, weight balances more naturally, scissors are more detailed(if you want heavy duty, not as fine scissors the 18 is better), has 2 blades instead on an unuseable nail file. The grippy scales are nice but the Victorinox is more usable. That said, the 18 is not a bad tool at all. The saw is just a bit more compromised is my biggest complaint.(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)
Thanks for the feedback guys, you saved me from disappointment it seems. I don't know how I didn't notice the locking blade and that funny tab, that alone is a deal breaker for me. I think my best bet is to keep an eye out for a good deal on an 84mm with scissors. Or follow Syphs method and make my own
That nail file on the Evo looks quite unexpected for a SAK, more like a cheap knock-off A waste of space IMHO...