My vote would be to keep it. We all know some LMs take break in time and lube. Some more than others.The PS4/ES4 are complex little doodads, and for them to exhibit the same level of QC as a SAK(much simpler design), it would add quite a significant amount of cost. Just food for thought.Everyone sees it differently, but that's my $0.02, for whatever it matters.And if it makes you feel any better, I have seen an increase in QC mishaps with Vic stuff lately as well, compared to their older stuff. So, it's not just LM trying to keep costs down, it is industry-wide(mostly because consumers don't want to pay more for things that constantly cost more to produce).
Doesn't have to be scissors. Vic does that well and consistently. Example: Nomad main blade liner lock isn't long enough, so there is front to back blade play - same goes for driver lock. Example: Split ring attachment on my Pioneer X has rough edges. Example: Mag frame in my new Explorer allows the lens to pop out quite easily. Example: Spring tension on back tools on some of my newer SAKs is much to tight and risks breaking a fingernail. That doesn't include the pliers tools, since you made the point that SwissTools aren't SAKs. All things I can overlook, because they aren't detrimental to the tool's overall operation.
I will probably return it tomorrow, most likely won't exchange it, seems like some really poor quality control on these, quite a few complaints on amazon about similar and breaking problems....