Total Members Voted: 98
This whole thread is in need of the question; If you have a SAK, then do you really need another knife?
Just sitting here eagerly waiting for Ron to turn up and blow this poll sky high
You don't ! ......... Well I don't at least !!! Although if I carry a pliers based tool it has one too ........ Can't think why they need to put one in PB MTs Is this thread aimed at primarily SAK guys? Just wonderijg how the poll would go if we put it in the general tools board ?
If you have a SAK, then do you really need another knife?
I had basically thought of it as targeted towards the sak folk. Mainly because there’s likely many on the main board that don’t carry a sak at all. Would be interesting to see what the results there would be. I wonder what the equivalent of “sak only” would be for a non sak person? Just a blade only knife? It seems like a sak is a bit different since it could stand in for a multi in some scenarios, where a knife only is more limited.
Thanks everyone for your comments so far I’m honestly surprised that “sak only” is in the lead. I assumed the combo would win out. Very interesting.
I voted combo. I do love my Squirt and it pairs so wonderfully with a SAK.
I voted "other".Because SAKs are not enough.Apart from my SAK combo, i.e. anywhere from two to thirty SAKs at once (*), I carry pruning shears, a folding saw, and one or more folders. I don't carry a pliers based MT, I can't even remember when was the last time I needed pliers.(*) https://forum.multitool.org/index.php/topic,75292.msg1612509.html#msg1612509
Sometimes a SAK can disturb people...
Not to derail the thread, but just...... ...
I think what Rizio is saying is that, whilst in many places a SAK is acceptable, in some places, or for some people, even the humble SAK causes consternation. I know, even from my own experience, this is true Very disappointing and - Yep agree with your ... ... But as you say - Let's not get into that discussion here - There are several threads on this in our forum
It's all I need. The Exec.(Image removed from quote.)