Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK

Poll

Which one do you prefer to carry?

2 Layer
13 (33.3%)
3 Layer
26 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 35

us Offline Nix

  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 24,263
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #30 on: February 20, 2021, 11:19:10 PM
Two layers for me, generally - alox Soldier, Recruit, Tourist, serrated Spartan. I’m also fond of the Camper. Any thicker and I may as well carry a Swisschamp.




If you have a SwissChamp....you might try a 30-day SwissChamp challenge.....and then try carrying a Ranger.

Just like magic!

The Ranger will seem delightfully slim and easy to EDC.   :D


us Offline pa_strunk

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,809
  • MAJ/APA
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #31 on: February 20, 2021, 11:27:05 PM
 :iagree: then a guy named Poncho shows you his Master Ranger and you have to mod one for yourself. This story never ends no matter how many layers or tools you have.
"Every generation has the obligation to free men's minds for a look at new worlds, to look out from a higher plateau than the last generation." Ellison Onizuka


nz Offline Sawl Goodman

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 941
  • Between this & that.
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #32 on: February 20, 2021, 11:59:10 PM
(Image removed from quote.)


If you have a SwissChamp....you might try a 30-day SwissChamp challenge.....and then try carrying a Ranger.

Just like magic!

The Ranger will seem delightfully slim and easy to EDC.   :D

I know the SC very well.  8)  It’s easily my choice of comprehensive SAK. One always lives in my shoulder bag although it fits comfortably in my jeans watch pocket. It doesn’t see much use but it’s there if I need it and has been invaluable at those times. I find two layers or the Camper have much better handling so they get the pocket carry nod.

 :cheers:
Rambler


us Offline Nix

  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 24,263
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #33 on: February 21, 2021, 12:02:33 AM
 :2tu:



us Offline Jim the Brave

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,334
  • Hardwood sawyer, and follower of Jesus Christ
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #34 on: February 21, 2021, 12:55:12 AM
You know what I find interesting is how everybody has their limit. Their limit where "X-big is where I draw the line." Everybody has a different sweetspot. Me, I can carry two or three lbs. of SAK's around with me and hardly feel it. (And half a ton of keys, too, at the same time). Somebody else be like, "The Compact is just right for me" or "The Tinker's just right, but sometimes I miss the scissors" and I'm like   :think:  :rofl:

Bu that's all ok, it just shows how we're all different. And it makes me wonder where my upper limit is. I think I would find carrying a SwissChamp around in my pocket to be somewhat tedious (a pretty big old lump) but more to the point, I would find it tedious in my hand if I had to use it for very many minutes on end. But as I say that, I pick one up just now and look at it, and I'm like, you know, it's really not that bad. But if I had a 130mm knife that thick with all its stuff, that would definitely be tedious to carry around, and tedious to try to use on everything.

Which brings me back to thinking, you know, I really would like to have my different tools split up onto different knives. To where, for instance, a Deluxe Tinker would make a great companion for my Ranger. One in each pocket. And so on.

But none of that gets me to 3 layers, let alone 2.
This life is merely a staging ground for eternity. Are you preparing for the rest of forever?


us Offline ElevenBlade

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,407
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #35 on: February 21, 2021, 01:14:26 AM
You know what I find interesting is how everybody has their limit. Their limit where "X-big is where I draw the line." Everybody has a different sweetspot. Me, I can carry two or three lbs. of SAK's around with me and hardly feel it. (And half a ton of keys, too, at the same time). Somebody else be like, "The Compact is just right for me" or "The Tinker's just right, but sometimes I miss the scissors" and I'm like   :think:  :rofl:

Bu that's all ok, it just shows how we're all different. And it makes me wonder where my upper limit is. I think I would find carrying a SwissChamp around in my pocket to be somewhat tedious (a pretty big old lump) but more to the point, I would find it tedious in my hand if I had to use it for very many minutes on end. But as I say that, I pick one up just now and look at it, and I'm like, you know, it's really not that bad. But if I had a 130mm knife that thick with all its stuff, that would definitely be tedious to carry around, and tedious to try to use on everything.

Which brings me back to thinking, you know, I really would like to have my different tools split up onto different knives. To where, for instance, a Deluxe Tinker would make a great companion for my Ranger. One in each pocket. And so on.

But none of that gets me to 3 layers, let alone 2.

Sounds like a good lead in story for a Two-SAK Challenge.... Or an Anything + SAK Challenge.   :cheers:

It's certainly remarkable that some tools feel too bulky - I used to pocket carry a LM Wave, but I need a suspension clip for a Pioneer X.   :dunno:


nz Offline Sawl Goodman

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 941
  • Between this & that.
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #36 on: February 21, 2021, 01:38:10 AM
Which brings me back to thinking, you know, I really would like to have my different tools split up onto different knives. To where, for instance, a Deluxe Tinker would make a great companion for my Ranger. One in each pocket. And so on.

I’d love to have a SC minus the blade and opener layers to pair with my fave two layer knives. Aside from the redundancy, mass, and bulk, the SC’s outside layers are dead cumbersome to use.
Rambler


us Offline Jim the Brave

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,334
  • Hardwood sawyer, and follower of Jesus Christ
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #37 on: February 21, 2021, 02:24:36 AM
I’d love to have a SC minus the blade and opener layers to pair with my fave two layer knives. Aside from the redundancy, mass, and bulk, the SC’s outside layers are dead cumbersome to use.

 :like:, :iagree:

THIS MAN SPEAKS TRUTH
This life is merely a staging ground for eternity. Are you preparing for the rest of forever?


us Offline Jim the Brave

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,334
  • Hardwood sawyer, and follower of Jesus Christ
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #38 on: February 21, 2021, 02:27:13 AM
In fact if you could take out the scissors, too, it's easy to grab a Super Tink or a Climber to go with.
This life is merely a staging ground for eternity. Are you preparing for the rest of forever?


nz Offline Sawl Goodman

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 941
  • Between this & that.
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #39 on: February 21, 2021, 02:31:25 AM
In fact if you could take out the scissors, too, it's easy to grab a Super Tink or a Climber to go with.

Or any combo you like.  :)  I’d probably remove the saw layer and carry a Camper as a companion knife.
Rambler


us Offline Jim the Brave

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,334
  • Hardwood sawyer, and follower of Jesus Christ
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #40 on: February 21, 2021, 02:37:33 AM
Or any combo you like.  :)  I’d probably remove the saw layer and carry a Camper as a companion knife.

Yep I think we're onto something.
This life is merely a staging ground for eternity. Are you preparing for the rest of forever?


nz Offline Sawl Goodman

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 941
  • Between this & that.
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #41 on: February 21, 2021, 03:22:40 AM
Yep I think we're onto something.

I’d have done it already, if skills I had!  :D
Rambler


us Offline nate j

  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *******
    • Posts: 5,597
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #42 on: February 21, 2021, 05:27:07 AM
Incidentally, adding a Classic or Manager to the keyring fixes the aforementioned problems and makes two layer SAks perfectly viable.

I know this is a popular option, but having tried it myself, I found it to have a couple of significant drawbacks:
  • The 58 mm scissors, while excellent for their size, are not the equal of the 91 mm scissors.
  • Carrying a knife on my key ring meant that I either had to use that knife with a wad of keys hanging off the end of it, or take the extra time to remove the knife from the key ring before using and reattach after using.


il Offline pomsbz

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,595
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #43 on: February 21, 2021, 09:47:50 AM
No scissors.....?    :think:

 :climber:

I have a Rambler on my keychain. To be honest I just don't use scissors all that often to justify carrying that extra layer. 
"It is better to lose health like a spendthrift than to waste it like a miser." - Robert Louis Stevenson


us Offline ElevenBlade

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,407
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #44 on: February 21, 2021, 02:59:04 PM
I know this is a popular option, but having tried it myself, I found it to have a couple of significant drawbacks:
  • The 58 mm scissors, while excellent for their size, are not the equal of the 91 mm scissors.
  • Carrying a knife on my key ring meant that I either had to use that knife with a wad of keys hanging off the end of it, or take the extra time to remove the knife from the key ring before using and reattach after using.

Similar experience here.  I hate to admit it, but a LM Micra has worked much better for me in this regard. I carried it on an S-biner for a while, but I had issues with it getting twisted and stuck.  Now I keep it (off the keys) in my jacket pocket. 


us Offline Nix

  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 24,263
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #45 on: February 21, 2021, 04:27:42 PM
Or any combo you like.  :)  I’d probably remove the saw layer and carry a Camper as a companion knife.

Swap a backside Phillips for one of the corkscrews?


00 Offline Simon_Templar

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,442
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #46 on: February 21, 2021, 10:43:41 PM
I know this is a popular option, but having tried it myself, I found it to have a couple of significant drawbacks:
  • The 58 mm scissors, while excellent for their size, are not the equal of the 91 mm scissors.
  • Carrying a knife on my key ring meant that I either had to use that knife with a wad of keys hanging off the end of it, or take the extra time to remove the knife from the key ring before using and reattach after using.

I agree having it all on a 91/93 mm SAK is king. It just won't have two layers  :dunno:


us Offline Jim the Brave

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,334
  • Hardwood sawyer, and follower of Jesus Christ
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #47 on: February 22, 2021, 06:23:53 AM
I agree having it all on a 91/93 mm SAK is king. It just won't have two layers  :dunno:

 :iagree:
This life is merely a staging ground for eternity. Are you preparing for the rest of forever?


us Offline nate j

  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *******
    • Posts: 5,597
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #48 on: February 22, 2021, 02:32:29 PM
I agree having it all on a 91/93 mm SAK is king. It just won't have two layers  :dunno:

 :tu:


00 Offline SgtTowser

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 834
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #49 on: February 23, 2021, 03:36:03 PM
My solution to the “tool removal” issue from a key ring passed unresolved through regular key rings, pull and twist to open key rings, key caddies, sprung carabiners and sprung carabiners with o-ring locks.

It was a dark time of my life!

Like Mick J, I couldn’t get no satisfaction.

If it was easy to get the key or tool off, it came off accidentally. BAD!

If it was too hard, key/tool removal was annoying and untimely. WORSE!

Issue resolution came with a triangular ring that has a gap and a screw tube closing and opening a gap on one side.

No accidental openings.

Quick, easy intentional openings for removal of key or tool.

Works for me.

Your mileage may vary.


00 Offline SgtTowser

  • *
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 834
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #50 on: February 23, 2021, 04:11:31 PM
Regarding the holy grail of 3 layers in a two layer knife, I believe it can be done by Swiza’s approach to scissors.

But Swiza is not recognizing it yet.

Swiza scissors are essentially two large blades facing each other that scissor together to cut.

There is no reason these blades cannot be designed to work independently as knife blades and together as scissors.

Once designed this way, then the spine of the locking blade  blade can be machined for can opener function. The tip of non  locking scissor blade can be machined for can opener function.

The old GAK combined functions on the blade successfully.

Aitor makes a 2 layer knife with a skeletonized multi function blade that is very good.

The trick is to combine multi function blades with Swiza’s scissor approach.



us Offline nate j

  • *
  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *******
    • Posts: 5,597
Re: 2 layer vs 3 Layer SAK
Reply #51 on: February 23, 2021, 09:09:14 PM
Regarding the holy grail of 3 layers in a two layer knife...

The Vic Compact is actually a really good effort in this vein.  I just personally can't get on with the combo tool vs. the opener layer, and like having both large and small blades.


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
May Goal: $300.00
Due Date: May 31
Total Receipts: $10.00
PayPal Fees: $0.69
Net Balance: $9.31
Below Goal: $290.69
Site Currency: USD
 3%
May Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal