Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


Scissors not in line with the times, why?

xfile · 16 · 1448

cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Scissors not in line with the times, why?
on: January 06, 2021, 01:46:29 PM
This  scissors is obviously out of date with other tools,and I don't know the model of the SAK,but it's definitely not a later modification,I'm a little confused. :facepalm:
QQ图片20210106203739_副本.jpg
* QQ图片20210106203739_副本.jpg (Filesize: 162.44 KB)
QQ图片20210106203757_副本.jpg
* QQ图片20210106203757_副本.jpg (Filesize: 165.78 KB)


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #1 on: January 06, 2021, 02:03:55 PM
Compared with the champion in '73
QQ图片20210106203812_副本.jpg
* QQ图片20210106203812_副本.jpg (Filesize: 207.58 KB)
QQ图片20210106204901_副本.jpg
* QQ图片20210106204901_副本.jpg (Filesize: 235.09 KB)


Offline jimylee

  • New User
    • Posts: 1
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #2 on: January 06, 2021, 02:56:10 PM
Wahaha


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk


us Offline cody6268

  • Absolutely No Life Club
  • *******
    • Posts: 5,830
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #3 on: January 06, 2021, 04:06:59 PM
In my opinion, that's a Fisherman that has been repaired by warranty at some point much later in its lifetime. I have an 84mm Craftsman of about that same vintage, that someone had the right idea to repair the scissors, but did it all wrong (crudely sticking a piece of brass where the screw goes), so I sent it off to Victorinox about two years ago and got '80s scissors and an '80s main blade.


hr Offline enki_ck

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *
    • Posts: 20,904
  • I may get older but I refuse to grow up.
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #4 on: January 06, 2021, 04:51:26 PM
Wahaha


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk

Very nice to see you joining the forum and discussions here on MTO, jimylee :salute:

Welcome to the forum.

I hope we get to see some of your by now great collection I believe. :2tu:


spam Offline comis

  • *
  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 11,241
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #5 on: January 06, 2021, 05:02:44 PM
In my opinion, that's a Fisherman that has been repaired by warranty at some point much later in its lifetime. I have an 84mm Craftsman of about that same vintage, that someone had the right idea to repair the scissors, but did it all wrong (crudely sticking a piece of brass where the screw goes), so I sent it off to Victorinox about two years ago and got '80s scissors and an '80s main blade.

Cody beats me to it, I think that's true.  Not many cutlery company offers life time warranty while in business for more than a hundred years nowadays, and if the certain parts did run out, they very well would replace it with a tool from another era.


us Offline jazzbass

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 1,376
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #6 on: January 06, 2021, 06:32:20 PM
In my opinion, that's a Fisherman that has been repaired by warranty at some point much later in its lifetime

This was my first thought and is a very strong possibility as well. 50 years ago these knives were relatively expensive and the case for a warranty repair is high. This is a pretty easy repair, too - pull the tail pin out, replace scissors, reinsert new pin.

This  scissors is obviously out of date with other tools%uFF0Cand I don't know the model of the SAK,but it's definitely not a later modification,I'm a little confused. :facepalm:

That said, there's a very good chance this is an unmodified knife. The scissors aren't really out of date here - I've seen lots of knives from the late 1960s/early 70s that have the older features (bail, +PAT, double bevel scaler) and the newer, deep cut scissors. A quick look in my collection shows three Champion LNF (two are NIB) with this same tool combination. This whole period from c 1969 - 1974 really is almost a free-for-all. Tons of different combinations as tools are phased in and out, changes made, etc. There is a TON of overlap here, and there are many, many tool combinations.

Champions from my collection:

« Last Edit: January 06, 2021, 07:36:29 PM by jazzbass »


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #7 on: January 07, 2021, 07:35:54 AM
Wahaha


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk

 :cheers:


us Offline kamakiri

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,215
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #8 on: January 07, 2021, 07:52:05 AM
Looks normal to me.

Maybe ‘70. More pics of all the tools would be nice.

If this post has been helpful in dating your Swiss Army Knife, please consider making a small contribution to help keep SAKWiki going


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #9 on: January 07, 2021, 08:26:12 AM
In my opinion, that's a Fisherman that has been repaired by warranty at some point much later in its lifetime. I have an 84mm Craftsman of about that same vintage, that someone had the right idea to repair the scissors, but did it all wrong (crudely sticking a piece of brass where the screw goes), so I sent it off to Victorinox about two years ago and got '80s scissors and an '80s main blade.

Thank you! This is an old fisherman,but I don't understand the reason for repairing it. every tool is so new. :facepalm:


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #10 on: January 07, 2021, 08:35:27 AM
This was my first thought and is a very strong possibility as well. 50 years ago these knives were relatively expensive and the case for a warranty repair is high. This is a pretty easy repair, too - pull the tail pin out, replace scissors, reinsert new pin.

That said, there's a very good chance this is an unmodified knife. The scissors aren't really out of date here - I've seen lots of knives from the late 1960s/early 70s that have the older features (bail, +PAT, double bevel scaler) and the newer, deep cut scissors. A quick look in my collection shows three Champion LNF (two are NIB) with this same tool combination. This whole period from c 1969 - 1974 really is almost a free-for-all. Tons of different combinations as tools are phased in and out, changes made, etc. There is a TON of overlap here, and there are many, many tool combinations.

Champions from my collection:

(Image removed from quote.)
Sorry I can't see your picture,your explanation makes me more sure that this knife is not repaired.So bail and square Philips have been used for about 74 years?When was the first year of the new scissors?


us Offline kamakiri

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,215
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #11 on: January 08, 2021, 06:08:19 AM
This one is clearly 1970. A 136maU Master Craftsman.

Hope that helps.
If this post has been helpful in dating your Swiss Army Knife, please consider making a small contribution to help keep SAKWiki going


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #12 on: January 08, 2021, 07:10:21 AM
This one is clearly 1970. A 136maU Master Craftsman.

Hope that helps.

fantastic! :cheers:


us Offline kamakiri

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,215
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #13 on: January 09, 2021, 02:11:01 AM
Can’t say this one was repaired!  ;)



If this post has been helpful in dating your Swiss Army Knife, please consider making a small contribution to help keep SAKWiki going


cn Offline xfile

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 356
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #14 on: January 09, 2021, 03:30:16 AM


us Offline kamakiri

  • *
  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 3,215
Re: Scissors not in line with the times, why?
Reply #15 on: January 09, 2021, 06:55:53 PM
:drool:

Sadly, not mine.

Seller listed for $75

I offer $26

Seller counters $60 ‘absolute minimum’

I counter $27.5

Seller declines.

Seller lowers price to $49.

Seller goes to bid...$0.99

I decide to watch only. 

Item sells at auction $22.50.

Sigh.  :(
If this post has been helpful in dating your Swiss Army Knife, please consider making a small contribution to help keep SAKWiki going


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
May Goal: $300.00
Due Date: May 31
Total Receipts: $36.34
PayPal Fees: $1.66
Net Balance: $34.68
Below Goal: $265.32
Site Currency: USD
 12%
May Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal