AxelF raised an excellent point in another thread and I thought I'd expand on it. Maybe LM and Vic make better tools, but if one figures in price, who delivers the most quality/dollar (euro, GBP, CHF, etc)So with that in mind, using MSRP (the only reliable start point), which MT delivers the most quality/cost. That's not the same as the mostest toolz/dollar (at least in my mind) ie 20 Colorful Enunciationty tools isn't more quality than 4 high quality tools.
I think this all depends on how much "quality" is "needed", right? I mean, the Kobalt tool at Lowes (~$15 I think?) would probably get more jobs done for less money than all of our other favorite tools. But of course we like fit, finish, durability, design, reliability, etc... so we gladly pay more for them.
The LM Kick IMO. It's cheap, lightweight, and has excellent implements.
Hadn't looked at a Kick really. At $40 MSRP, that's a lot of tool. Looks like the replacement for the PST. Good choice
Most bang for the buck? Probably those red Vic Farmers that Amazon was blowing out for $11 a while back.Most bang for the pocket space? LM Squirt.MSRP is an unfair measure for Swiss Army knives, which are heavily discounted compared to other mutlitools.Some would interpret "Most bang for the buck" as favoring the cheap Asian clonesbut the "bang" that the tools make when they break in two isn't what we had in mind.+1
A roll of duck tape. A couple of bucks to buy, millions of uses.