Multitool.org Forum
+-

Hello Lurker! Remove this ad and much more by logging in.


Evolution of the can opener

Dunc · 10 · 3716

england Offline Dunc

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • *
    • Posts: 11,293
  • Aggressive in defence
Evolution of the can opener
on: January 03, 2012, 05:13:19 AM
This morning I had to open some food cans and I grabbed a pst to use , while it opened to tin it was hard work and left the tin edges very jagged and mangled , I also found it hard to compleatly remove the lid without it turning sideways and diving down into the can in some kind of final death throw and forcing the can contents out and ending up in a mess . I put this at first down to it being an old used and worn pst and thought the can opener was probably blunt so I got my late unused model and that was exactly the same . Finally I used my Wave on a third can and it was a joy to use . So PST can openers suck although they do open bottles ok . Now if we go back 10 years or so and the great vic versus lm debate and how vics can opener was far superior to lm I can honestly say that was true but nowadays I wouldn't be so sure and would put the two on level pegging .


england Offline Dunc

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • *
    • Posts: 11,293
  • Aggressive in defence
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #1 on: January 03, 2012, 08:29:42 AM
As my thinking about this continues I remembered the Wingman/Sidekicks can opener , while its an acceptable can opener it falls very short as a bottle opener as it is too sharp at the point and tends to pierce the centre of the cap rather then use it as a pressure and pivot point . No big deal but when you open as many bottles of beer as me  >:D you get to know which ones are smoother to operate .


gb Offline Zed

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 19,555
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #2 on: January 03, 2012, 12:35:19 PM
As my thinking about this continues I remembered the Wingman/Sidekicks can opener , while its an acceptable can opener it falls very short as a bottle opener as it is too sharp at the point and tends to pierce the centre of the cap rather then use it as a pressure and pivot point . No big deal but when you open as many bottles of beer as me  >:D you get to know which ones are smoother to operate .

Oddly the bottle opener is one tool i could live with out as being a guiness drinker  :D but i do find can openers a issue on some MT's but not one that puts me off as the drivers are more a issue with me  :tu:


cy Offline dks

  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *********
    • Posts: 21,804
  • Δοξα συ ο Θεός
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #3 on: January 03, 2012, 12:47:59 PM
This got me thinking about Corkscrews.

I used the one on my LM Flair a few  :drink: times during the Holidays and whilst it sort of works it is still very thin, short and fragile looking.

It cannot go deep enough into the cork, if you want to use the bottle opener as a lever for removing it and it tends to bend and twist in a worrying manner... though I have not damaged it yet.
It, however, looks quite sexy ! and has a fork and pretty vine pictures on....  :D

The Swiss Army ones, however have always (way before LM was created) been a lot more solid and user friendly.

I have not yet tried any newer LM corkscrews (Juice and?) so I do not know if they have also improved.
Kelly: "Daddy, what makes men cheat on women?
Al : "Women!"

[ Knife threads ]  [ Country shopping guides ]  [ Battery-Charger-Light threads ]  [ Picture threads ]


gb Offline AimlessWanderer

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 17,518
  • I'm not a pessimist, I'm an experienced optimist!
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #4 on: January 03, 2012, 01:17:43 PM
This got me thinking about Corkscrews.

I used the one on my LM Flair a few  :drink: times during the Holidays and whilst it sort of works it is still very thin, short and fragile looking.

It cannot go deep enough into the cork, if you want to use the bottle opener as a lever for removing it and it tends to bend and twist in a worrying manner... though I have not damaged it yet.
It, however, looks quite sexy ! and has a fork and pretty vine pictures on....  :D

The Swiss Army ones, however have always (way before LM was created) been a lot more solid and user friendly.

I have not yet tried any newer LM corkscrews (Juice and?) so I do not know if they have also improved.

I think the biggest evolution in terms of can opener is the ring pull cans  :D I still like Vic and Wenger style, but don't think I've ever used a LM to try and open a can other than a comparison test with a SAK with a Juice - the Juice failed to even get started  :(

I like corkscrews, but since putting a Tru Utility Twistick in my wallet, it doesn't matter if I have a SAK with corkscew or not. I still prefer the inline phillips over the backspring variety, but I can now carry my Deluxe Tinker without having a corkscrew crisis  ;) I don't miss the eyeglasses driver either if I've got my gadget ring as there's a Wenger Pocket Tool Chest on it which covers that nicely  :)


The cantankerous but occasionally useful member, formally known as 50ft-trad


um Offline Mr. Whippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • *
    • Posts: 12,208
  • North American Meetup: May13-15 2011
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #5 on: January 03, 2012, 06:23:19 PM
Hmm...

In my head to head tests, the Vic can opener is best.  It handles a wide variety of cans and leaves a very clean edge.

The Leatherman (Charge ALX) can opener came in second.  It did fine on cans up to the 15 oz size, but when the big, industrial cans came out, it took significantly more work with less clean edges.  It beat out the Wenger only because the Leatherman opener locks in place.

The Wenger came in third.  It was also fine up to the 15 oz size can, but in large commercial/industrial sized cans, the opener would stick and fold closed on itself.    Really a lot of work to open the larger cans.


gb Offline AimlessWanderer

  • *
  • Zombie Apprentice
  • ********
    • Posts: 17,518
  • I'm not a pessimist, I'm an experienced optimist!
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #6 on: January 03, 2012, 06:40:57 PM
The Wenger scores bonus points for me for being a good general purpose pokey thing  :D

To be honest though I don't tend to open any cans with multitools or SAK's unless I'm stuck (if standard kitchen opener breaks for example), and I've always reached for a SAK purely out of habit  :-[


The cantankerous but occasionally useful member, formally known as 50ft-trad


nl Offline jan.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 400
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #7 on: January 03, 2012, 08:24:10 PM


il Offline Threeme2189

  • No Life Club
  • ******
    • Posts: 2,021
  • When in doubt, use a bigger hammer.
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #8 on: January 03, 2012, 10:45:55 PM
Chuck Norris' preferred iron supplement is rebar.


us Offline J-sews

  • Admin Team
  • *
  • Absolute Zombie Club
  • *
    • Posts: 23,224
Re: Evolution of the can opener
Reply #9 on: January 04, 2012, 04:25:24 AM
In order to be certain of having the right tool for every job.........one must first acquire a lot of tools


 

Donations

Operational Funds

Help us keep the Unworkable working!
Donate with PayPal!
May Goal: $300.00
Due Date: May 31
Total Receipts: $66.45
PayPal Fees: $3.99
Net Balance: $62.46
Below Goal: $237.54
Site Currency: USD
21% 
May Donations

Community Links


Powered by EzPortal