Total Members Voted: 100
Quote from: jerseydevil on December 15, 2013, 04:39:02 AMI've used the fish scaler as a fork to steal french fries, corn dog nuggets, and mozzarella sticks from people at work a number of times now. Don't want to lose that capability...... it is also a great rubber band launcher. hook the band in the end, pull band back (on smooth top) aim and release
I've used the fish scaler as a fork to steal french fries, corn dog nuggets, and mozzarella sticks from people at work a number of times now. Don't want to lose that capability......
I think there are two generation of design for the bit-holder and the older really had the mentioned problem, the newer though is vastly improved.
I'd go for the Swisschamp as I'm just so familiar with it, plus I really do appreciate the Phillips on it I think one of the biggest appeals to me with the Swisschamp is its versatility, I've tackled all sorts of tasks with it over the years, and i just find cybertools just too focused really
I just don't see a SAK as a place for a bit driver
Quote from: Mike, Lord of the Spammers! on December 15, 2013, 02:09:15 AMI'd go for the Swisschamp as I'm just so familiar with it, plus I really do appreciate the Phillips on it I think one of the biggest appeals to me with the Swisschamp is its versatility, I've tackled all sorts of tasks with it over the years, and i just find cybertools just too focused really Too focused on what? And if you like the Phillips, the CT41 has three different phillips bits, so you should be covered with pretty much any Phillips screw.But I get what everyone's saying about the SwissChamp. There's just something about it that one has to love. But every time I think "man, maybe it is better", then I can't make a case for having the fish scaler instead of the bit driver...
Quote from: Etherealicer on December 14, 2013, 08:30:14 PMI think there are two generation of design for the bit-holder and the older really had the mentioned problem, the newer though is vastly improved.Really?My Cybertool was bought in the year they first came out and with over a decade of EDC and regular use (I was working as a computer technician) I've never had that problem. My Cybertool still has its original bits and they are still working great.
Quote from: KiwiMark on December 15, 2013, 08:50:35 AMQuote from: Etherealicer on December 14, 2013, 08:30:14 PMI think there are two generation of design for the bit-holder and the older really had the mentioned problem, the newer though is vastly improved.Really?My Cybertool was bought in the year they first came out and with over a decade of EDC and regular use (I was working as a computer technician) I've never had that problem. My Cybertool still has its original bits and they are still working great.I'm not the expert here, but I seem to remember that they changed the "nubs" (see image), which improved the bit-case. I think there was even a thread about this here on MT.O.
How many of these do I own and have had apart? I just notice this now?
GigaHz noticed that this spring. Here's his photo and a link to that thread. http://forum.multitool.org/swiss-forum/i-must-be-blind/
They are equals. Not one is better than the other. sent from Nate's mobile
Quote from: Monrogue on December 15, 2013, 05:50:01 AMI just don't see a SAK as a place for a bit driverI get what you're saying, but... is there really something that a SAK isn't a place for? To me, that's the brilliance of the SwissChamp/CT4 – they have pretty much every tool you would ever need in everyday life.
Quote from: ducttapetech on December 15, 2013, 02:17:27 PMThey are equals. Not one is better than the other. sent from Nate's mobileI saw you were the most recent post, and I thought you were going to say "Surge, for the win" that would have been awesome!
I have read this thread with great interest, having just purchased a CT41. After a great deal of consideration, and assessing the available evidence....I'm buying a Swisschamp too! Oh and I'm coveting a Swisschamp XLT but that's just insane.....
I agree Elevenblade. I've used it as a ruler, fork, square....probably everything BUT a scaler
I used to think it's the CT 41, but the Champ is in fact the Champ. I love my EDC-CT 34 but found I hardly ever use any other bit than the Philips. They are just too damn small for everyday life. On the other hand, I do miss the magnifier every once in a while. Given that the SC is the same size as a CT 41, that makes it the winner in my book despite having the rather useless fish scaler on board. And it is considerably cheaper to boot. Now if it were only available without a fish scaler, saw and metal file...
To illustrate that fact, I paid less than $30 for the really good condition SwissChamp I have. CT41s--I haven't seen many under $100. I think $80 may have been the cheapest I ever saw one.
This is the 2010 with the GITD scales I did yesterday to ‘match’ its blue FireAnt.