...I may need to mod my own Alox version....
Nothing is ever perfect, unless you mod/make your own.
As I said, I made my own, the missing parts are finally here."Perfect" in the sense that it features the tools that the Skeletool is missing, but that the Wave has. When paired, Skeletool and my opener-less Farmer X are pretty darn close to what I've been looking for.But I guess the perfect SAK is the one you need but don't know it yet...
I was once at the point where I really wanted an Alox Compact. I just made 91mm Alox scales and glued them on. (Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)
I agree with some of the above…Sounds like a Victorinox Compact to me :-)Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This is very nice but I think it's fair to say that people like the Alox models not just because of the scales. The tools themselves are beefier in some cases i.e. main blade and bottle opener/driver. The inline awl is possibly the best multitool awl out there. The liners are Nickel Silver which is stronger, albeit heavier, than Aluminium. The rivets are larger and stronger. Finally the backsprings are stronger I think because there are no backtools.So fixing alox scales on a 91mm SAK does not make it an alox SAK.
It's been my experience that there are so many "Almost" SAKs that it has to be a marketing ploy! Every single one of mine is a compromise to what I actually want; want a Voyageur, got a Compact. Want a Salesman, got a Super Tinker. Want scissors with that, sorry - not on this model. The one SAK that I have that was exactly what I wanted is my Craftsman - all the tools I wanted and none that I don't. But, alas, it doesn't have an inline Phillips. Oh well.
Depends where you are comparing from right?SAK X vs 93mm alox pioneer is different than 84mm alox cadet vs SAK X.Welcome to the boards ShropshireLad.
I started reading this thread thinking 'Compact' and then thought 'Alox'!This thread is speaking my language!" I currently EDC a Compact, and would love to have this model in Alox some day!!