Quote from: hansthebear on December 15, 2011, 10:30:21 PMfor a zombie apocalypse?Am I the only zombie hunter who has strategically placed tools in different places (other than home) for a possible scenario?You know, just so you don't have to face a "just one tool" situation?
for a zombie apocalypse?
Just for clarity, "zombie hunter" is being used in this case as a euphemism for "to prepare and protect yourself and loved ones form the panicky dumb smurfs who aren't prepared for the next hostile attack from those who would destroy our way of life", or a natural disaster...
...Al's Survival Priorities:...
A ST200.It was my 1st multitool, so It seems fitting that it will be my last
OK still a little more "worlds end" than me though - I'm more your emergency bottle top/cork/staple removing, package opening, and string cutting type chap .... Although I do have heavier tools (knives and axes and so on) in more than one place, they are all where they are to serve a "day to day" (or less severe) function, but could greatly assist in a more challenging set of circumstances. Also,my knowledge, experience, improvisation skills and unendless ability to make a complete hash of something in an often highly amusing fashion is carried with me always Disaster prep for me is knowing the location and opening times of the nearest boozer and chip shop.Al's Survival Priorities:1) Cigarettes2) Tea3) Bacon4) Single Malt Scotch5) Pornography.... in that order Apologies for my temporary inability to take this more seriously - it's the last day of a long week
Quote from: turnsouth on December 16, 2011, 03:14:05 PMJust for clarity, "zombie hunter" is being used in this case as a euphemism for "to prepare and protect yourself and loved ones form the panicky dumb smurfs who aren't prepared for the next hostile attack from those who would destroy our way of life", or a natural disaster...OK still a little more "worlds end" than me though - I'm more your emergency bottle top/cork/staple removing, package opening, and string cutting type chap .... Although I do have heavier tools (knives and axes and so on) in more than one place, they are all where they are to serve a "day to day" (or less severe) function, but could greatly assist in a more challenging set of circumstances. Also,my knowledge, experience, improvisation skills and unendless ability to make a complete hash of something in an often highly amusing fashion is carried with me always Disaster prep for me is knowing the location and opening times of the nearest boozer and chip shop.Al's Survival Priorities:1) Cigarettes2) Tea3) Bacon4) Single Malt Scotch5) Pornography.... in that order Apologies for my temporary inability to take this more seriously - it's the last day of a long week
Quote from: turnsouth on December 16, 2011, 03:14:05 PMJust for clarity, "zombie hunter" is being used in this case as a euphemism for "to prepare and protect yourself and loved ones form the panicky dumb smurfs who aren't prepared for the next hostile attack from those who would destroy our way of life", or a natural disaster...I'm not so sure about the "zombie hunter" label, but I think the whole idea of a "zombie apocalypse" is very literally applicable to a mass plague or epidemic (or pandemic) disease scenario. Of course, while not literally wanting to eat brains or the like (I could be wrong of course), in a situation where there was some kind of pandemic disease outbreak causing possibly even millions of casualties, it's entirely possible to have hordes of the diseased wandering around trying to survive. Those who were less afflicted most likely preying on the dead or near dead for their clothes, possessions, etc. to try and survive. There are historical accounts from the time of the Black Death in Europe of diseased people wandering aimlessly and doing anything they could just to survive... and of people preying on others for goods and resources to try and save their loved ones, and so on. Something like 60% of the population of Europe died during that time. In our modern society, the effects could potentially be much worse.I honestly think this is a much more realistic possibility, given the burgeoning population of the planet, than something like a nuclear holocaust, once in a billion year solar flare destroying all technology, or the like. In fact, from what I know about astronomy, it's more likely we'd get hit by another small asteroid than a nuclear Armageddon or the like. In other words, I'd say that's probably a distant no. 2 on the list of possibilities, with pandemic being at the top.Regardless, the moral of the story is it pays to be prepared to be as self sufficient as possible, and not to be overly reliant on non-sustainable or renewable resources and technology.
Quote from: 50ft-trad on December 16, 2011, 03:35:09 PMOK still a little more "worlds end" than me though - I'm more your emergency bottle top/cork/staple removing, package opening, and string cutting type chap .... Although I do have heavier tools (knives and axes and so on) in more than one place, they are all where they are to serve a "day to day" (or less severe) function, but could greatly assist in a more challenging set of circumstances. Also,my knowledge, experience, improvisation skills and unendless ability to make a complete hash of something in an often highly amusing fashion is carried with me always Disaster prep for me is knowing the location and opening times of the nearest boozer and chip shop.Al's Survival Priorities:1) Cigarettes2) Tea3) Bacon4) Single Malt Scotch5) Pornography.... in that order Apologies for my temporary inability to take this more seriously - it's the last day of a long week swap teatea for coffee and single malt scotch for more coffee and ill be happy.
Hope the big multitool companies think about designing and apocalypse series multitool. Marketing line: "The multitool you carry when a thread in Multitool.Org makes you choose only one!"
I still think the pandemic scenario is most likely. The issue with examples like AIDS is that it has a very slow course of progression, and is not the retrovirus itself that kills, but other corollary illnesses that effect the person because of the diminished immune response. A new disease of sufficient virulence with an unknown epidemiology could easily result in hundreds of millions of casualties on a world-wide scale. The only reason ebola didn't become the great threat many people thought it would was because it wasn't nearly as virulent as originally estimated, which gave us time to figure out its epidemiology and how to stop it. Something virulent enough to kill in 24 - 48 hours (there are strains of small pox like that) could easily create the situation I describe. And with the way genetic modification is being pursued today, I think it's a very real threat.Back to the topic...Work Champ! Work Champ! Work Champ!
I suggest you guys read World War Z, forgot the name of the author. I think the biggest treat is not the zombies but people who are desperate enough to kill for resources of other people. If you have a secure area it will be overwhelmed not by zombies ,with their limited movement, but by panicking able bodied people which can compromise or diminish the security of the area.
Quote from: Heinz Doofenshmirtz on December 17, 2011, 01:18:39 AMI still think the pandemic scenario is most likely. The issue with examples like AIDS is that it has a very slow course of progression, and is not the retrovirus itself that kills, but other corollary illnesses that effect the person because of the diminished immune response. A new disease of sufficient virulence with an unknown epidemiology could easily result in hundreds of millions of casualties on a world-wide scale. The only reason ebola didn't become the great threat many people thought it would was because it wasn't nearly as virulent as originally estimated, which gave us time to figure out its epidemiology and how to stop it. Something virulent enough to kill in 24 - 48 hours (there are strains of small pox like that) could easily create the situation I describe. And with the way genetic modification is being pursued today, I think it's a very real threat.Back to the topic...Work Champ! Work Champ! Work Champ! Well, that's the point innit? DNA viruses have a certain profile, RNA viruses a different one. Bacteria a completely different one. A highly virulent organism has a rapid tempo which can easily be contained (despite infectivity) by quarantine systems. It is the slow, persistent infections which are hard to detect because infection can be widespread before clinically apparent.HIV (or Hepatitis B/C) are much tougher to defeat because vast populations are fatally infected before detection. However, discovering the precise organism allows for treatment strategies (like HIV). Yes, ebola and other hemorrhagic virii are dramatic, but quarantine the affected area and the infection burns itself out.For me: Damascus Wave. I can appreciate the beautiful steel patterns as I remove the Zombie's head.
Quote from: duckman1975 on December 16, 2011, 11:52:02 PMHope the big multitool companies think about designing and apocalypse series multitool. Marketing line: "The multitool you carry when a thread in Multitool.Org makes you choose only one!"But they already have:(Image removed from quote.)
The whole "killing people for there resources thing" could be really possible, if not, INEVITABLE in a global pandemic/zombie/etc scenario!!It would be Mad Max all over again