That said, must one just accept the fact that rust is inevitable if one wants a solid, wear-resistant multitool?
All that being said, for the asking price of hi-end LM's, would it be so hard for them to make the plier heads out of Cr-Mo alloy?
Am I totally off with this line of reasoning?
I'm guessing those scissors are actually not titanium but are Titanium Nitride coated steel.
That said, I am of the school of thought that the polish is more important that the steel for rust resistance.
I can't find any specific spec sheets for "Cr-Mo" alloy
A lot of your point had to do with upgrading materials and production without raising the cost
The assumption that the steel is the main problem is also a little spotty since Victorinox uses a really similar steel but experiences nowhere near the complaints that Leatherman does.
I think that the best way to reduce the incidences or rust on one's tools would be to wash them regularly, throughly dry them either in the sun or in an area with circulating air and lubricate thoroughly.
::ETA::Here's a rusty guy. (Image removed from quote.)
Too my mind a MT is one of those 'often carried, little used' things, and so you shouldn't really have to closely inspect it every day/week looking for rust in all the various nooks and cranies
As for Titanium, Spooneys bang on the money, it's just too soft to be used as a tool metal
I'd like to see a tool with zdp189 stainless. 3% of carbon, 20% of chromium, and HRc of 65.
Am I the only Leatherman owner on here that has NEVER had any rust on any of their Leatherman tools??? I would say I am an average user of tools and I very rarely clean, oil or wipe them down and I have never had any issues.What are you lot doing wrong?
it might be the desert but my leatherans do not have rust issues and i carry one every day.
Titanium, like plain iron, performs better when alloyed with something else.
Polish no doubt plays a role. But then, I haven't seen that many complaints of Gerbers rusting prematurely, and most (all?) their tools are mat/bead-blasted.
My point is you SHOULD be getting better rust resistance for the price already paid.
At most online stores I've been to, a Spirit retails for less than a Wave (sometimes significantly less).
It seems LM uses 420HC for some of its knife blades. Victorinox uses "INOX" type steel. From what I could gather here, INOX has moly in it, 420HC does not. IMO there's more than mere extra polishing going on here. It doesn't take much of an additive to change the particular characteristics of an alloy by a significant margin (just look at how small variations in carbon content affect a steel's properties).
That just seems like a lot of muss and fuss to "maintain" a tool supposedly made of "stainless." Also, some people have reported rust despite these preventative measures.
I've got over a half dozen LM's,and the first one is 25yrs old,and I don't have rust on any of them,they are like any good tool,you take care of them properly an they will last a life time,I've got some of my granddads tools that are over a hundred years old,and they are still workable.Moral of the story is,you take care of them,they take care of you!!!
Here's a rusty guy. (Image removed from quote.)
Personally I would like LM to go for LESS rust resistant steels. Namely, tool steel pliers and such. Since I usually take very good care of the tool anyway, the stainless steel is wasted on me, especially since it's softer than other steels. I wish I had the choice, frankly.
Quote from: bobofish on May 31, 2008, 06:00:18 AMPersonally I would like LM to go for LESS rust resistant steels. Namely, tool steel pliers and such. Since I usually take very good care of the tool anyway, the stainless steel is wasted on me, especially since it's softer than other steels. I wish I had the choice, frankly. I Couldn't Agree More!
Any metal will rust.