I've wondered about this from time to time.Why does Vic always stick to the spear point main blade, such as in the Soldier and its variants lineup, as opposed to going with the clip point blade.Is the spear point blade just a more inheritantly stronger blade? Better slicer/cutter shape over the clip blade? Just cause they feel like it? Is the spear point just a better all around blade shape across the board for a knife meant for utilitarian purposes?Just found it curious that they've stuck with a spear point for what seems like forever. Even on other makers scout type knives.I figured that members here with a deeper understanding of blade shape geometries would know. All you smart fellers out there.
I've modded my Tinker and Deluxe Tinker, both main and small blades, to clip points. Easy to do, just go slow with lots of cooling.Rich
You do get greater strength in a spearpoint, but at the cost of a slight trade-off in penetration
Quote from: Mike, Lord of the Spammers! on May 01, 2015, 02:01:25 PMYou do get greater strength in a spearpoint, but at the cost of a slight trade-off in penetration Exactly. SAKs aren't made for penetrating, except the longer, 120-130mm models. On the other hand you find clip points everywhere, most modern tactical folding knives, Leatherman Multitools, and traditionals, such as Laguioles, Opinels, Cases, Bucks, Douk-Douks. As a long term SAK user I am addicted to spear points, that's why I EDC the Opinel #8 Jardin and I'm impatiently waiting for my K55K.
Spear point blades are just better all around blades than clips. Also as a point of clarification, Pen blades are small spear points originally designed to sharpen quill pens, hence the name. The larger blade on a SAK is a Spear Blade, not a pen blade.Sent from my BNTV400 using Tapatalk