although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....
Perhaps we have a case of Schroedinger's SAK :-)Rich
Quote from: Rich S on November 21, 2015, 09:38:29 PMPerhaps we have a case of Schroedinger's SAK :-)Rich
Consideration is act of considering, i.e. is the concept of a wide range of meanings, from opinioning, trough estimation and so on, even up to the evaluating facts. While understanding the consideration as an act of opinioning, then any term can be used according to someone's opinion, that is, how the subject feel/perceive something, irrespective of the facts.Considering the term consideration as thought or evaluating facts, then the term have to be used according to the facts. That means, if someone (usually manufacturer or inventor or let's say global consensus of scientists/experts and so on) has named something and has also clearly specified what that object or concept it is and what it is not, then we have to use the term according to that very facts of its name and/or specifications.So, some term/name can be used to specify something, i.e. to explain what that thing is, or it can be used just for naming/assigning a name to that thing – an example: you have a boat and you call it Shark/Medusa/whatever, but this in no way means that the boat is the thing shark, it's just its name or also a nickname; if you woul entitle your wife Medusa, that would not mean … you get it At some point V & W (manufacturers, authors) have named their products SAKs, so all those tools which can be identified like all those named as SAKs by companies/manufacturers, can be called SAKs. Then, when Vic makes a (in all effects) SAK, but for the purpose of selling it to the German army would call it GAK, that tool itself is still a SAK tool or boat in our case, although it is now named GAK or Shark in our case.Considering the fact of the tool, the GAK is a SAK.Considering the fact of the name, the GAK is a GAK.Considering the fact of the new name for known tool, the GAK is a SAK now named GAK.Considering the opinion about GAK, it can be/or can not be perceived as SAK, as it is in all effects a SAK tool, but it is also a thing/tool that is now named GAK.
Makes complete sense!!
.... so, I was right then....?
Quote from: 50ft-trad on November 21, 2015, 07:28:30 PM although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....Reminds me of Schrodinger's cat... being considered as both alive and dead at the same time
Quote from: red_rider_1979 on November 21, 2015, 07:34:56 PMQuote from: 50ft-trad on November 21, 2015, 07:28:30 PM although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....Reminds me of Schrodinger's cat... being considered as both alive and dead at the same time didn't that cat die in a box, poisoned?Sent from my outdated communication device using an obsolete application
Quote from: tjfarrington2000 on November 23, 2015, 04:28:36 AMQuote from: red_rider_1979 on November 21, 2015, 07:34:56 PMQuote from: 50ft-trad on November 21, 2015, 07:28:30 PM although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....Reminds me of Schrodinger's cat... being considered as both alive and dead at the same time didn't that cat die in a box, poisoned?Sent from my outdated communication device using an obsolete applicationWe can't be certain, she could also be alive and well... of course that would not explain the smell
Quote from: Etherealicer on November 23, 2015, 08:40:49 AMQuote from: tjfarrington2000 on November 23, 2015, 04:28:36 AMQuote from: red_rider_1979 on November 21, 2015, 07:34:56 PMQuote from: 50ft-trad on November 21, 2015, 07:28:30 PM although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....Reminds me of Schrodinger's cat... being considered as both alive and dead at the same time didn't that cat die in a box, poisoned?Sent from my outdated communication device using an obsolete applicationWe can't be certain, she could also be alive and well... of course that would not explain the smell (Image removed from quote.)
It's not about the military affiliation but the producer of the product.
Quote from: Etherealicer on November 23, 2015, 08:40:49 AMQuote from: tjfarrington2000 on November 23, 2015, 04:28:36 AMQuote from: red_rider_1979 on November 21, 2015, 07:34:56 PMQuote from: 50ft-trad on November 21, 2015, 07:28:30 PM although they are still Swiss Army Knives as well as not being Swiss Army Knives ....Reminds me of Schrodinger's cat... being considered as both alive and dead at the same time didn't that cat die in a box, poisoned?Sent from my outdated communication device using an obsolete applicationWe can't be certain, she could also be alive and well... of course that would not explain the smell Well,no,cats arn't so stupid to get stuck in a box with a deadly substance and a limited amount of air. The cat is actually eating some tuna,and washing it down with cold milk in a parallel dimension after slipping out through Schrodingers Catflap!
You can't know that, you can't even proof that after going thought to the parallel dimension it's still the same cat. It might just be an identical copy (see LHC teleportation experiments). Of course this is a can of worms. If something gets destroyed at a sub-atomic level and re-built, did it die? Is it still alive? Is it dead and alive?
The sandero, seems like a good option, at least in its basic form.