A Juice. Shrink the Spirit to this size please, and leave the locks off. And fit a pocket clip while you're at it.
Quote from: hiraethus on January 05, 2017, 04:46:00 PMA Juice. Shrink the Spirit to this size please, and leave the locks off. And fit a pocket clip while you're at it. Was thinking the very same.
Mr. Elsener seems like such a serious and dour man. I would give him a REV so he would have something to laugh about.
Quote from: Alan K. on January 06, 2017, 06:54:35 PMMr. Elsener seems like such a serious and dour man. I would give him a REV so he would have something to laugh about. I think the Leatherman Faceplant Leap might me a good choice for that purpose too.
Quote from: 50ft-trad on January 06, 2017, 07:11:02 PMQuote from: Alan K. on January 06, 2017, 06:54:35 PMMr. Elsener seems like such a serious and dour man. I would give him a REV so he would have something to laugh about. I think the Leatherman Faceplant Leap might me a good choice for that purpose too.The Leap is a fine MT for my little girl I like the fact that they actually made one for children and I have used some of the implements on it without fail as well
Wave with pocket clip.That is something Victorinox haven't been able to come up.
I do believe Victorinox did "greatly" benefit from those in the plier based MT world and I would argue LM "greatly" influenced or inspired them. If we look at when they started their plier based tools as opposed to the others including in particular LM. Their ( Vics ) idea for pliers was those contained on the Swisschamp. I might be wrong in this but didn't 10 years pass before they came out with plier based MT after LM had theirs in the market place? While we can and do argue who has a "better" plier based MT fact is LM was first to market over them. IIRC didn't Victorinox buy a patent or company and design or greatly improve the design for the release of their plier based tool?We can also look at how the company had been in business prior to their release of a plier bases MT. While they certainly put out a terrific plier based tools and for some the best plier based tools credit has to go to LM. I do realize LM was not the first.
Quote from: Aloha007 on January 10, 2017, 04:05:18 PMI do believe Victorinox did "greatly" benefit from those in the plier based MT world and I would argue LM "greatly" influenced or inspired them. If we look at when they started their plier based tools as opposed to the others including in particular LM. Their ( Vics ) idea for pliers was those contained on the Swisschamp. I might be wrong in this but didn't 10 years pass before they came out with plier based MT after LM had theirs in the market place? While we can and do argue who has a "better" plier based MT fact is LM was first to market over them. IIRC didn't Victorinox buy a patent or company and design or greatly improve the design for the release of their plier based tool?We can also look at how the company had been in business prior to their release of a plier bases MT. While they certainly put out a terrific plier based tools and for some the best plier based tools credit has to go to LM. I do realize LM was not the first. I agree, Victorinox might have been influenced or inspired, or simply behind schedule in R&D, but still came out on top with a far superior product, and superior in every way, design, quality, forms, assembly and really important to me; corrosion protection. Had Vics MT at sea for years...no corrosion. Now Leatherman and Gerber's...many are at the bottom of the ocean.
I personally do not think that the Victorinox Family would benefit greatly from ANY input from the likes of Leatherman... Now: perhaps Wenger...but not Leatrherman.