I’ll never understand why . . .
The why question is always about what management believes will increase share value and dividends for the owners. We think it should be about what we want (me too

), but we only get what we want if it happens to coincide with what management thinks best affects the balance sheet.
There are tons of things that I think Leatherman should do, like innovate, like release outside opening Rebars and ST300s, like bring back a new Juice lineup and PS4, and on and on. But Leatherman has a different idea about the balance sheet.
Take the Glock 43X, for example. It would be one of the greatest things in the gun world if Glock made a 15 round magazine for the 43X. But
nooooo. Why? Presumably it would cannibalize the Glock 19, and that's not good for the balance sheet. So we don't get what we want.