What about a review GAW? Choose a really good prize for incentive to encourage people to work hard on this. Each contestant has to pick a tool/flashlight/bag/piece of gear that they own out of the ones that have not been reviewed on the main site and submit a properly formatted review of that tool to be posted on the main site. Then we vote on the best review, or a random one is drawn for the prize. That way we get a GAW that will help the site too.
Quote from: gdoolittle on August 03, 2017, 06:46:40 PMWhat about a review GAW? Choose a really good prize for incentive to encourage people to work hard on this. Each contestant has to pick a tool/flashlight/bag/piece of gear that they own out of the ones that have not been reviewed on the main site and submit a properly formatted review of that tool to be posted on the main site. Then we vote on the best review, or a random one is drawn for the prize. That way we get a GAW that will help the site too.The review GAW is how I won my Skeletool on here back in 08 We had to go by a certain format and do a tool that didn't already have a review in the main site Then I can't remember how we decided the winner Maybe a pole dks get on that will you
Don't go randomizing lists, or using online RNGs. Get some Gamer's Dice, or be more creative like Grant has been in the past with the balloons or rubber ducklings. When I went back to college we did testing on RNGs online, on TI-84's, and other electronic methods. Those actually had quite a few numbers showing up more refquently that other numbers - even when widening the amount of numbers to be used. Scripting, aka programming, is not as random as you would think. One fella brought in Gamer's Dice, and the numbers were far more varied than any other electronic/internet method, and there's various dice to be used as multipliers or other digits. Preferred Grant's ducklings & balloons method better. Grant has better ideas on picking, and he's more fair dinkum in the process - and fun to read/view photos. Gave away a Fitbit Charge to some facebook friends. Added numbers to their names; wrote those on cards. Filled bathtub with water and gently placed each on in the water. Took photos every hour or so, and posted. Oddly the one I thought for sure was going to go under soon, as it had water creeping up on all edges, won. Course this took a few hours The idea I used a while back was inspired by Grant, although Corowyn actually proved to be the ace in the hole with his skills. Sneaksies!
Quote from: Outback in Idaho on August 03, 2017, 09:54:10 PM Don't go randomizing lists, or using online RNGs. Get some Gamer's Dice, or be more creative like Grant has been in the past with the balloons or rubber ducklings. When I went back to college we did testing on RNGs online, on TI-84's, and other electronic methods. Those actually had quite a few numbers showing up more refquently that other numbers - even when widening the amount of numbers to be used. Scripting, aka programming, is not as random as you would think. One fella brought in Gamer's Dice, and the numbers were far more varied than any other electronic/internet method, and there's various dice to be used as multipliers or other digits. Preferred Grant's ducklings & balloons method better. Grant has better ideas on picking, and he's more fair dinkum in the process - and fun to read/view photos. Gave away a Fitbit Charge to some facebook friends. Added numbers to their names; wrote those on cards. Filled bathtub with water and gently placed each on in the water. Took photos every hour or so, and posted. Oddly the one I thought for sure was going to go under soon, as it had water creeping up on all edges, won. Course this took a few hours The idea I used a while back was inspired by Grant, although Corowyn actually proved to be the ace in the hole with his skills. Sneaksies! I've got a ten sided die that can be used to roll any number between 0 and 99. First roll decides the "tens" unit(0's,10's,20's, etc) and second roll decides the "ones" unit(0,1,2,3,4,5,etc)
Quote from: Pablo O'Brien on August 03, 2017, 10:00:10 PMQuote from: Outback in Idaho on August 03, 2017, 09:54:10 PM Don't go randomizing lists, or using online RNGs. Get some Gamer's Dice, or be more creative like Grant has been in the past with the balloons or rubber ducklings. When I went back to college we did testing on RNGs online, on TI-84's, and other electronic methods. Those actually had quite a few numbers showing up more refquently that other numbers - even when widening the amount of numbers to be used. Scripting, aka programming, is not as random as you would think. One fella brought in Gamer's Dice, and the numbers were far more varied than any other electronic/internet method, and there's various dice to be used as multipliers or other digits. Preferred Grant's ducklings & balloons method better. Grant has better ideas on picking, and he's more fair dinkum in the process - and fun to read/view photos. Gave away a Fitbit Charge to some facebook friends. Added numbers to their names; wrote those on cards. Filled bathtub with water and gently placed each on in the water. Took photos every hour or so, and posted. Oddly the one I thought for sure was going to go under soon, as it had water creeping up on all edges, won. Course this took a few hours The idea I used a while back was inspired by Grant, although Corowyn actually proved to be the ace in the hole with his skills. Sneaksies! I've got a ten sided die that can be used to roll any number between 0 and 99. First roll decides the "tens" unit(0's,10's,20's, etc) and second roll decides the "ones" unit(0,1,2,3,4,5,etc) Did you see this MONSTER?!? http://nerdist.com/this-d120-is-the-largest-mathematically-fair-die-possible/
Quote from: Outback in Idaho on August 03, 2017, 10:31:46 PMQuote from: Pablo O'Brien on August 03, 2017, 10:00:10 PMQuote from: Outback in Idaho on August 03, 2017, 09:54:10 PM Don't go randomizing lists, or using online RNGs. Get some Gamer's Dice, or be more creative like Grant has been in the past with the balloons or rubber ducklings. When I went back to college we did testing on RNGs online, on TI-84's, and other electronic methods. Those actually had quite a few numbers showing up more refquently that other numbers - even when widening the amount of numbers to be used. Scripting, aka programming, is not as random as you would think. One fella brought in Gamer's Dice, and the numbers were far more varied than any other electronic/internet method, and there's various dice to be used as multipliers or other digits. Preferred Grant's ducklings & balloons method better. Grant has better ideas on picking, and he's more fair dinkum in the process - and fun to read/view photos. Gave away a Fitbit Charge to some facebook friends. Added numbers to their names; wrote those on cards. Filled bathtub with water and gently placed each on in the water. Took photos every hour or so, and posted. Oddly the one I thought for sure was going to go under soon, as it had water creeping up on all edges, won. Course this took a few hours The idea I used a while back was inspired by Grant, although Corowyn actually proved to be the ace in the hole with his skills. Sneaksies! I've got a ten sided die that can be used to roll any number between 0 and 99. First roll decides the "tens" unit(0's,10's,20's, etc) and second roll decides the "ones" unit(0,1,2,3,4,5,etc) Did you see this MONSTER?!? http://nerdist.com/this-d120-is-the-largest-mathematically-fair-die-possible/I don't need one, but I want one!
Giveaway for best pun in the forum this past year.
Quote from: Syncop8r on August 08, 2017, 05:55:52 AMGiveaway for best pun in the forum this past year. Why, thanks, Sync! But I've already won some prizes, so... Give someone else a chance, huh?...
Quote from: dks on July 19, 2017, 09:48:22 AMhttp://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/mystery-couple-who-vanished-milking-10822643couple's remains found 75 years later in iceI saw that... who keeps their cows near glaciers?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/mystery-couple-who-vanished-milking-10822643couple's remains found 75 years later in ice
Maybe if you had a cow named Julio....Show contentJulio Inglaciers
Quote from: pfrsantos on August 08, 2017, 12:02:27 PMQuote from: Syncop8r on August 08, 2017, 05:55:52 AMGiveaway for best pun in the forum this past year. Why, thanks, Sync! But I've already won some prizes, so... Give someone else a chance, huh?... Surely it has to be this one?Quote from: Syncop8r on July 19, 2017, 12:08:18 PMQuote from: dks on July 19, 2017, 09:48:22 AMhttp://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/mystery-couple-who-vanished-milking-10822643couple's remains found 75 years later in iceI saw that... who keeps their cows near glaciers?Quote from: Syncop8r on July 19, 2017, 12:14:09 PMMaybe if you had a cow named Julio....Show contentJulio Inglaciers
It's not.Show contentAnd don't call me Shirley!
Quote from: pfrsantos on August 08, 2017, 12:18:24 PMIt's not.Show contentAnd don't call me Shirley! But it suits dresses you!
What I have enjoyed so far is the one where some of us lost sleep trying to be the one to post last or hit the mysterious number. That was crazy and fun!Not sure if I want a repeat tho, depends on the prize I guess But I do like the winner being selected totally randomly as it levels the playing field. But put a minimum number of posts first please
You could supply a pic and let us come up with captions for it. I think we had something like this before...
The battleship game is always popular but takes a lot of your time to administer. Chuck a load of screws,bolts, nuts etc in a big jar and guess how many is in it. Closest wins the gaw.Next time you cut a tree up take a pic of the log pile and count them when you move them. Same rules as above.Tent peg pile. I'm sorting out my camping gear at the mo, I'll chuck every tent peg I can find into a pile and photo them, then count them. I'll send you the results to use in a draw with the same rules as above.Photo challenge, post a pic of a face/word/number made up with mulits, saks or knives. Draw a winner with random.org I'll think of more...
A Find Waldo kind of game.Large pic with a tool somewhere hidden.The first to locate it (by a battleship grid) and name the tool, wins that exact tool.
Specific competitions are a lot less inclusive than the 'pick a number', but maybe to spice up the GAW, posting a pic of something that most people own, along with picking the number, makes it a bit different.
Quote from: Poncho65 on August 03, 2017, 07:15:07 PMQuote from: gdoolittle on August 03, 2017, 06:46:40 PMWhat about a review GAW? Choose a really good prize for incentive to encourage people to work hard on this. Each contestant has to pick a tool/flashlight/bag/piece of gear that they own out of the ones that have not been reviewed on the main site and submit a properly formatted review of that tool to be posted on the main site. Then we vote on the best review, or a random one is drawn for the prize. That way we get a GAW that will help the site too.The review GAW is how I won my Skeletool on here back in 08 We had to go by a certain format and do a tool that didn't already have a review in the main site Then I can't remember how we decided the winner Maybe a pole dks get on that will you Nice! I had no clue it had been done before
Quote from: Syncop8r on August 08, 2017, 12:25:16 PMQuote from: pfrsantos on August 08, 2017, 12:18:24 PMIt's not.Show contentAnd don't call me Shirley! But it suits dresses you!FTFY...