Yeah, the whole concept of "raising funds" thru traffic law "enforcement" reeks big time. Always has, always will. I mean, how is the whole ticketing process supposed to be fair when the ticketing cop and everyone/thing above him stand to make a profit off the person he's arresting? I.e. "We need new gear? Simple, we'll just raise our quotas and double up on those 'traps' for the next few weeks. We need to replace a couple squad cars? No probs, let's shorten the timing on those yellows that have the 'redlight' cams. The mayor's mansion needs re-roofing?..." (You get the idea.)
Back in 2004, the province of New Brunswick announced that most traffic fines would be doubling. There was an article about it in the Telegraph Journal (a St-John daily), and in it the Finance Minister was quoted as saying that the move was to help "boost revenues" for the province (AT LEAST HE ADMITTED IT!). In the very same article, the Justice Minister denied that the move was a "tax grab," and that drivers who obeyed the law wouldn't have to worry about the hikes. (I LOL'd loudly when I read that.) When two top ministers can't get their stories straight on the same issue, you know the whole system is screwy.

If it were up to me, local/regional governments wouldn't touch one red cent of those fines. It'd ALL go to charities. Maybe THEN traffic law enforcement would actually be about SAFETY, instead of revenue generation.
And despite Def's relative "failure" in this case, he did the right thing by taking it to court. Anyone who can afford the time should take advantage of the court system whenever they get ticketed (even if you know you're "guilty"). At best, the arresting cop forgets who you are and can't ID you in court (I had a ticket dismissed that way

). At worst, you'll get the satisfaction that "The Man" won't have made a profit off of you (court costs).
http://www.ibiblio.org/rdu/secrets.html/climbs off soapbox.

Thin Blue Line
Def
Hmmm... My mother has a couple cousins in the local PD...
