I will enjoy following. I'm committed to the Modular Tool Challenge in February, or I would join you.
I almost queried whether a Surge was modular enough for that challenge with its t-shank adapter, but then decided that it didn't really fit the spirit of the challenge.
I've got a nib arc obsidian I haven't opened. I can't accept the price tag. My brother grabbed 2 more thinking I needed one before he knew i was sitting on one unopened... So in theory I have 2. I'm running out of time on the return window. But I've happily carried a P2 (so I like the Free technology). until recently switching back to a Charge Ti. For now the seals remain uncut on the obsidian(s). I think I'd love the arc since I love the P2. I just couldn't stomach the lack of bit holder on my P2 thus the switch to Ti. What we really need is a P1 which is a P2 with bit holder, full file, saw, anf lose the serrated blade and go with a P4 420 blade. Maybe it's a P3. Cut the cost to $179 and sell a butt load. It's a win for LM and those of us who buy tools to use.
Life’s too short - open the box and use that Arc!If you like the P2, but miss the bit holder you really will love the Arc.
I may even post a pic or two during the month just to fit in with the cool kids
Powernoodle Day 2 (Image removed from quote.)Many people like the bit adapter. I prefer a real, long shank 3D phillips. In lieu of that, I'll take a long 2D phillips. I prefer the reach over the ability to change bits. I don't think I have ever used a torx bit or other specialty bit with an MT, but people in certain trades might find those more useful. So, for me at least, this is a small win for the P4 over the ARC.
Excellent Day 2 pics
Good luck with the move PN!
Powernoodle Day 3Mrs. Powernoodle and I are in the process of moving our residence, which means that I am deconstructing a ton of cardboard boxes. I EDC a box cutter, and always use it on cardboard because there nothing better than a new utility blade for killing a box. In comparison, and as one would expect, the ARC was fairly lame as a cardboard slicer. The ARC's saber grind (with an unground portion near the spine) with DLC coating is grabby on cardboard, and doesn't want to slide through like a full flat grind. But the ARC's grind is also a little stronger than a full flat grind, and is more aimed at being a general-use blade than a slicer. I am constantly reminded that MTs are almost never the best at a specific task, but excel at convenience. [/i]