Actually, all of the gizmos on a SAK could be called 'weapons'. Is there any reason to believe that they won't? Best wishes. G
I read that Victorinox is planning a baseless line.
Just thinking about this I guess that there is quite a distinction between a knife / blade that is illegal to carry in some countries and buildingsAnd a tool that is not allowed on aeroplanes A bladeless SAK, maybe with saw, scissors, awl etc would probably be OK if stopped on the streets of Sydney .... as no bladeBut you still could not take in on a plane.
When Victorinox rolls out these bladeless wonders, I have a suggestion. Instead of making them with the traditional red (red means danger, right) cellidor, they need to make them green (all green is good) with the words NO BLADE on the sides. Then when you get stopped with one of the things, the tool can do part of your arguments. "It's legal. See? Look at the handle." Best wishes. G
the once (any only) time i tried to board a plane with a vic jetsetter in my carry-on i had it taken from me by TSA because of the scissors. made me wonder if anyone else has successfully carried one on a plane
Security most places would rather take it than figure it out. Better to carry something like a Shard or a GeeKey.
I'm actually in el paso TX right now sadly for one of my best friends funerals. Brain cancer took him far too early.